|
Main Phone: 847-367-4460









 |
|

Frequently Asked Questions about
Nursing Homes & Long Term Care |

Frequently Asked Questions about
Probate & Trust Administration |
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ESTATE PLANNING
What do you mean by “Estate Planning”?
Why are the legal rules pertaining to title
so important to planning my estate?
What are the different ways to title property?
What happens if I do not plan my estate?
How can I prevent having an intestate estate?
What is a will?
What is probate?
Are there any
advantages of probate?
What are the
disadvantages of probate?
Can probate be avoided?
Is there a better way
to avoid probate?
ESTATE PLANNING WITH TRUSTS
What is a trust?
What is a Testamentary Trust?
What is a Living Trust?
What is a Revocable Living
Trust?
How
does one place property into a Revocable Living Trust?
What are the benefits of a fully funded Revocable Living Trust?
What
instructions can a Revocable Living Trust contain?
What successor trustee instructions should be included in the trust?
What disability instructions should be included in the trust?
What instructions pertaining to the trust’s beneficiaries should be
included?
Are there any other benefits of having a Revocable Living Trust?
MEDICAID PLANNING
Why
Medicaid Planning?
Medicaid Glossary
ESTATE PLANNING FOR FAMILIES WITH MINOR CHILDREN
What
happens if parents fail to plan for their children?
What issues
are involved in planning for minors?
What issues are involved in making lifetime gifts to children or
grandchildren?
Who
should be named the guardian for minor children?
What issues are involved in leaving assets to minors upon your death?
How can I plan for a child who is disabled or has other special needs?
Are there any problems with creating a special needs trust?
What about
adult family members with special needs?
GUARDIANS & TRUSTEES
How do I choose who will take care of my children if something happens
to me?
What are the duties of a
guardian?
How do I choose a guardian?
How do I nominate
and replace a guardian?
Is it important
to name a Successor Trustee?
What are the duties and responsibilities of a Successor Trustee?
Who can I select
to be a Successor Trustee?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of selecting a family member
or friend as Successor Trustee?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of selecting an attorney, CPA,
or financial advisor as Successor Trustee?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of selecting a corporate
Successor Trustee?
How can a trustee be replaced?
Should more
than one Successor Trustee be named?
POWERS OF ATTORNEY FOR
FINANCES AND PROPERTY
What is a Power of Attorney?
What if I want my agent to act for me even if I become disabled?
Are
there any problems associated with Powers of Attorney?
HEALTHCARE POWERS OF
ATTORNEY AND “LIVING WILLS
What is a Healthcare
Power of Attorney?
What is a Living Will?
Which Healthcare
Directive should I have?
Are there any other healthcare issues to consider?
What is HIPAA and how
does it affect me?
ESTATE PLANNING FOR MARRIED COUPLES – SEPARATE PROPERTY VERSUS
COMMUNITY PROPERTY
What are some of the legal consequences of owning property separately
rather than as community property?
Are there any other differences between separate and community property?
Are there other differences?
What is a Community
Property Agreement?
SUCCESSION PLANNING FOR
THE FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS OR FARM
Why
is planning for the family owned business important?
What causes
business succession planning to fail?
How should you establish your succession plan?
THE IRREVOCABLE LIFE
INSURANCE TRUST
Can you
explain more about the estate tax brackets?
Is there a way for me to protect my life insurance from estate taxes?
What is an ILIT?
What planning opportunities do ILITs provide?
What other details are involved with creating an ILIT?
Can’t I just give my life insurance policy to someone instead of
creating an ILIT?
ADVANCED ESTATE
PLANNING WITH IRREVOCABLE TRUSTS
How can I remove property from my taxable estate and still personally
benefit from it?
What kind of valuation discounts do irrevocable trusts offer?
DYNASTY TRUSTS
Is there
a way to avoid the generation skipping tax?
What is a Dynasty Trust?
Can I create a Dynasty Trust in addition to a Revocable Living Trust?
Are there any
other uses of Dynasty Trusts?
CHARITABLE TRUSTS
What are the benefits of creating a Charitable Remainder Trust?
What exactly is
a Charitable Remainder Trust?
What makes a CRT so
beneficial?
How does this compare with just selling the asset and buying
income-producing assets?
Can you provide examples of when a CRT should be considered?
How
can I use a CRT to help raise my standard of living?
How can I
use a CRT to help pay for my retirement?
How can I
use a CRT to assist my elderly parents?
How can I use a CRT to help my grandchildren go to college?
A CRT sounds like a wonderful planning opportunity but are there any
drawbacks?
Now that I understand Charitable Remainder Trusts, how do they differ
from Charitable Lead Trusts?
How can I use a CLT
to benefit my family?
LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
What exactly is a
Limited Partnership?
What are the liability protections provided by a Limited Partnership?
What are the tax benefits provided by a Limited Partnership?
What factors need to be considered before establishing a Limited
Partnership?
How do
I know if a Limited Partnership is right for me?
ASSET PROTECTION
PLANNING
What is asset protection
planning?
What
asset protection does a Limited Partnership provide?
What is an Offshore Trust?
Why do
Offshore Trusts provide better asset protection?
How do you establish
an Offshore Trust?
What factors need to be considered before establishing an Offshore
Trust?
What are federal
estate and gift taxes?
The process of developing a sound estate plan of your own begins with
understanding the basic ingredients common to all good estate plans. Our
decades of experience working with thousands of clients have taught us
that an estate plan is sound only if it helps one accomplish several
important goals. Almost universally, our clients state that they want
their estate plans to achieve for them the following objectives:
• I want to control my property while I am alive;
• I want to take care of my loved ones and myself if I become disabled;
• I want to give what I have to whom I want, when I want, the way I
want; and
• Whenever possible, I want to save tax dollars, professional fees, and
court costs.
If you have these same goals for yourself and your family, then this
book is written specifically with you in mind because a good estate plan
can help you accomplish each of these objectives. Without a good estate
plan, you and your family will probably lose control over your property,
suffer through unnecessary court proceedings, and pay excessive taxes.
The lack of an estate plan may also deprive your family of many other
legal protections otherwise available and also deprive them of the
opportunity to receive from you a lasting legacy designed to bring your
family closer together. Fortunately, all of these ills can be easily
avoided by implementing a sound estate plan that passes your property to
your loved ones in the way that you want.
All good estate planning starts with making sure that your property is
legally owned in an appropriate way. The legal community uses the
technical term “title” to describe how property is owned and it is
exceptionally important that you understand the legal rules that govern
title.
Title is important to designing an estate plan because you cannot
plan for the disposition of property you do not own. Although you would
think it easy for everyone to know what they do or do not own, the rules
pertaining to property ownership are more complicated than they first
appear. Unfortunately every day families unintentionally lose control
and ownership of their property to others because these rules are widely
misunderstood.
For example, many people that have written a will or a trust assume that
all of their property will pass to their heirs according to the
instructions in that document, but that is not necessarily true! Of the
thousands of estate plans we have reviewed for clients seeking a second
opinion of their will or trust, we have discovered that a great number
of them will not work the way the clients think they will because the
client’s property has never been properly titled to ensure that it
passes to whom they want, when they want, and how they want.
Regardless of what you may have heard or think, unless your property is
correctly titled even the best estate plan will fail to distribute it
properly. Thus, in order for you to design an estate plan that
accomplishes your goals, it is essential that you first understand the
basic rules that govern the titling of property.
Property can be titled in several different ways. The five most
common ways of titling property are as follows:
• Fee simple;
• Tenancy in common;
• Joint tenancy;
• Tenancy in the entirety; and
• Community property.
Each of these ways of titling property differ from the others in three
key ways:
• The amount of control the title owner possesses over the property
while alive;
• The extent to which the owner is legally entitled to leave the
property to others upon his or her death; and
• The extent to which creditors of the owner can make claims against the
property.
Fee simple ownership exists when there is only one title owner. If you
own property that is titled solely in your name you possess total legal
control over it. This allows you to do with it whatever you want without
anyone else’s permission. You are free to retain, sell, or give the
property away whenever desired. You also may say who will receive the
property after your death. Finally, since only your individual legal
rights are involved, any creditor of yours can make a claim against any
of your fee simple property to satisfy a debt.
Tenancy in common ownership exists when two or more title owners hold
the property together as tenants in common. If you own tenancy in common
property, you share legal control of it with others. For example, if you
and one other person own property as tenants in common, and you both own
equal shares, you each own a fifty percent interest in it. If the
property were sold, you would divide the profits equally.
However, ownership of tenancy in common property does not have to be in
equal shares. Your share could be smaller or greater than another
tenancy in common owner’s share. The legal rule for tenancy in common
property is that all co-owners share in the right to fully use and enjoy
the property; Therefore, even if you owned only a small fractional
interest in tenancy in common property, you still have the right to use
it whenever you want. Although this arrangement is beneficial for those
owning small shares, it can cause problems if two or more tenants in
common desire to use the property at the same time or in different ways.
If you are a tenant in common, during your lifetime you can keep, sell,
or gift your respective share of the property. Likewise, as a tenant in
common you also may say who will receive the property after your death;
however, creditor claims against a tenant in common can be made only
against that tenant’s share of the property.
Joint tenancy ownership is like tenancy in common in that two or more
joint tenants own the property together and each owner has the right to
enjoy its entire use. A joint tenant, like a tenant in common, also has
the right while alive, to keep, sell, or gift their joint tenant’s
interest in the property to others.
Unlike a fee simple owner or a tenant in common, a joint tenant has no
right to leave their joint tenant’s interest to others at death. When
one joint owner dies, by law that tenant’s interest in the property is
automatically extinguished and the surviving joint tenants continue to
own the property together as joint tenants. Ultimately there will be
only one final survivor left when all of the others have died. If you
are the final surviving joint tenant, you will end up owning the entire
property in fee simple. Creditor claims against a joint tenant can be
made only against that tenant’s share in the property.
As stated above, a joint tenant’s interest is automatically extinguished
upon that person’s death. A benefit of this arrangement is that no
probating of joint tenancy property ever occurs. The decedent’s name is
simply removed from the title and the others continue owning it together
as joint tenants. While the probate free transfer of an asset is an
attractive benefit of joint tenancy ownership, it often causes rather
serious and unexpected consequences. Problems involving joint tenancy
ownership include the following situations that frequently occur:
• Often family members purchase property together and title it as joint
tenants without understanding that the last survivor will end up as the
property’s sole owner. Instead, they mistakenly think that if one of
them dies that owner’s share will pass to his or her spouse or children.
Thus the family of the first joint tenant who dies is rudely surprised
to learn they lose all rights to the property. If that were not bad
enough, under the law the decedent joint tenant is treated as having
made a gift of his or her interest in the property to the survivors.
Thus the family of the decedent might have to pay gift taxes from the
decedent’s estate for property they never get;
• If a parent remarries and retitles the family home in joint tenancy
with the new spouse, the children of the first marriage will lose all
rights to the home if the parent dies before the new spouse;
• If an elderly parent puts the family home in joint tenancy with an
adult child, the parent loses exclusive control over the home. The
parent will not be able to refinance or sell the home without the
child’s approval. Also, the parent’s home becomes exposed to the child’s
liabilities including automobile accidents, debts, bankruptcies, and
claims of the child’s spouse if there is a divorce. If there is more
than one child named as joint tenant, all of these dangers are
multiplied;
• If an elderly parent retitles savings or investment accounts in joint
tenancy with one child, expecting that child to share it with siblings
after the parent passes on, there can be unintended gift tax
consequences, even assuming the child shares it with the others (which
does not always happen); and
• If a child named as a joint tenant dies first, the property might be
probated and taxed first in the child’s estate and then probated and
taxed a second time in the parent’s estate.
Tenancy by the entirety ownership is a way married couples in some
separate property states, can title their primary residence to provide
creditor protection for a surviving spouse. Following the death of the
first spouse, the home titled as tenancy by the entirety automatically
passes to the surviving spouse free of probate. Creditors of both
spouses (such as a mortgage company or credit card company) may take
this property, but creditors of only one spouse cannot. This form of
ownership may be a good choice of title if either spouse might someday
be subject to business or professional liability since the property is
protected from creditor claims.
One major concern arises with property titled in tenancy by the entirety
if there are children from a prior marriage of either spouse. When one
spouse dies the surviving spouse will inherit the home while the
children of the deceased spouse will be disinherited.
Community Property ownership is a way married couples in community
property states can title their property to reflect that they each own
half of the property. In some states community property is also referred
to as “Marital Property.” Owning property as community property can help
couples escape unnecessary capital gains taxes. Upon the death of one
spouse the entire amount of community property gets a step-up in cost
basis. This means the surviving spouse can sell property without having
to pay capital gains tax after the death of his or her spouse. Community
property tax treatment is available in only a limited number of states.
If you do not plan your estate, you will leave what is legally known
as an “intestate estate”, one in which the deceased has left no
instructions. The families of those who fail to plan their estates have
a rude surprise awaiting for them - the government will fill in the
blanks with its own plan. After debts, probate costs, and taxes are
paid, the courts will divide the estate according to the laws of
intestate succession.
If you do not plan your estate, you may not know who your beneficiaries
are. Some states provide that the estate of a married decedent goes
entirely to the surviving spouse, provided there are no children from
another marriage. Other states provide that the surviving spouse
receives only half of the decedent’s estate with the other half going to
any children or their decedents. The first example may result in the
children being disinherited, especially if the surviving spouse
remarries, while the second example may leave the surviving spouse with
inadequate resources to maintain an adequate lifestyle.
If you do not plan your estate, and a minor child is entitled to receive
an inheritance by law, the court will place the inheritance in a
custodial trust. No withdrawals can be made without first obtaining the
permission of the court. Whatever is left of your child’s inheritance
will be given to your child on his or her eighteenth birthday - with no
guidance whatsoever. Since few eighteen year olds have the maturity to
properly handle a windfall inheritance, it is likely the inheritance
will be totally wasted in a short period of time.
If you do not plan your estate, and you have no spouse or children, most
states provide that distributions will be made to your parents. If your
parents are in a nursing home or receiving government assistance, who do
you think gets the inheritance?
If you do not plan your estate and fail to appoint the personal
representative (executor) you want to administer it, the court will fill
in the blank by appointing one of its own choice for you according to
statutory formula. Children or other heirs may have an equal legal right
to be named the estate’s personal representative and may fight over who
should be named. This often leads to family feuds and court battles that
could have been avoided had the parents simply named their own personal
representatives.
If you do not plan your estate, the personal representative may be
forced to pay for an expensive bond to insure the estate. This is money
that could otherwise have gone to your loved ones.
If you do not plan your estate and you and your spouse both die
prematurely, the probate court will appoint the guardian it chooses for
your minor children instead of the ones you could have, but failed, to
name yourselves. In other words, a stranger to the family will get to
decide who tucks in your children at night and takes care of all of
their other needs.
If you do not plan your estate, the courts will also maintain continuing
jurisdiction over any inheritance left for your children. Court
permission is needed to use the inheritance and the court is likely to
require an annual accounting of every penny spent. The result is
additional accounting and attorney’s fees, paid out of the inheritance,
every year until your child becomes eighteen.
You can prevent having an intestate estate by leaving written
instructions of your own. One way of leaving such instructions is by
writing a will.
A will is a written document that tells the court how to divide your
property at the time of your death. It also tells the court who should
be the guardian for your minor children and your personal
representative. Wills are filed with the court at time of death, and the
court oversees the administration of the will through a process known as
probate.
Probate is a legal court proceeding, supervised by a probate court
judge, that is used to gather a deceased person’s assets, pay creditors,
court costs, and taxes and then distribute what is left to those
entitled to receive it. In probate proceedings, the court sets the time
limit in which creditors may file claims. The probate estate cannot be
closed until the period for filing claims has expired and settlement
with each creditor has been resolved. In general, you can expect a
probate proceeding to last one year or longer. There have been many
notable cases that have been tied up in probate court for several years.
The probate process allows creditors to make claims for debts incurred
during the deceased’s lifetime and allows the estate to pursue other
legal actions pertaining to the decedent. Notice of the probate
proceeding must be given to all known creditors and to all creditors who
might be known after careful investigation. It must also be given to all
relatives who may be legal heirs, even if they are not included in the
will.
Advocates of probate argue that because probate proceedings are held
in open court, it benefits potential heirs by providing everyone equal
access to information contained in the probate record. They also argue
that court supervision of the probate process benefits society by
providing an orderly way of wrapping up a decedent’s estate. They
further argue that additional benefits exist in that institutions
dealing with probate court orders recognize them as binding, that rights
of lost heirs are severed, that claims not timely filed can be legally
barred, and that the estate may pursue any litigation deemed necessary.
The disadvantages of probating a will are many. The probate process
is expensive, time consuming, and intrusive. Court costs, attorney fees,
personal representative fees, bonds, and accounting fees all add up. The
cost of probate is often between 3% and 8% of the gross value of an
estate (up to eight thousand dollars for a hundred thousand dollar
estate). If your estate is probated without a will, the costs of probate
may be even greater. The probate process is a notoriously protracted
legal procedure. Studies in one state reveal that the median time for
settlement is thirteen months. If the probate proceedings are contested,
the ensuing legal battle can take several years.
Probate proceedings also intrude on a family’s privacy. Probate
proceedings take place in open court where the family’s private
financial records are made a public record. The family is forced to
reveal for public inspection a listing of all of the family’s savings,
investments, and real estate. Also, now that many probate courts are
making their records available on -line, anyone with a computer can
easily access your family’s probate records.
The estate is vulnerable to attack during probate proceedings from
unhappy relatives and to suits from creditors who must receive certain
legal notices. It is not unheard of for someone to file a claim in a
probate proceeding simply as a way of forcing the estate to settle the
claim in order to avoid an expensive legal fight.
Yes, fortunately probate can be avoided. As already discussed,
probate proceedings can be avoided by titling property with someone else
in joint tenancy. Such property will be transferred to the surviving
joint tenant probate free. Because joint tenancy property passes probate
free, many individuals mistakenly believe they do not need further
planning if everything is titled in joint tenancy. But as discussed
above, joint tenancy can result in property passing to unintended heirs,
risks unforeseen tax consequences, and can result in loss of assets to
lawsuits and other misfortunes.
Furthermore, an estate plan that relies only on joint tenancy ownership
fails to provide any protection if one or both joint tenants become
disabled by illness or accident. For example, if a husband and wife own
property as joint tenants and the husband suffers a stroke, it may be
legally difficult or impossible for the wife to make the decisions
necessary to handle the couple’s property without petitioning the court
to be appointed the legal guardian of the disabled husband. This is a
major pitfall of joint tenancy ownership that many couples unfortunately
fail to anticipate.
In some community property states, probate can also be avoided for
married couples who title their property as marital property so that it
passes probate free to the surviving spouse. Again, this provides no
protection if one or both spouses become disabled and does not provide a
mechanism to transfer assets to the next generation at the death of the
second spouse.
Yes! A simple and superior way of avoiding probate is to place your
property in a trust so that it passes probate free. To learn more about
trusts, turn to the next chapter.
A trust is a written legal document that provides instructions on how
the property titled in the trust’s name is to be managed. These written
instructions can provide important legal benefits.
There are generally three people who are involved with trusts. First is
the person who makes the trust. This person is therefore appropriately
known as the “Trustmaker” or as is the case with married couples
planning together in one trust, “Joint Trustmakers”. Second is the
person or institution (like a bank) entrusted by the Trustmaker to carry
out the trust’s instructions. This person is known as the “Trustee.”
Third is the person who benefits from the trust. This person is known as
the “Trust Beneficiary.” One advantage of Revocable Living Trusts is
that the same person who makes the trust can be, and usually is, also
the Trustee and the Beneficiary of his or her own trust. Therefore you
can make a trust, be the Trustee who manages it, and also be the one who
benefits from it.
Trusts have been used since the Middle Ages and actually predate wills.
They can also take various forms. Two main types of trusts are
“Testamentary Trusts” and “Living Trusts.”
When a person drafts a will, sometimes they do not want the
inheritance to go immediately upon their death to a spouse or child.
Instead, they want the property to be managed for the beneficiary’s
protection over an extended period of time. One way to accomplish this
is to state in the will that upon the maker’s death a Testamentary Trust
will be created to manage the inheritance for the beneficiary. A
Testamentary Trust, like a will, is legally effective only after one
dies and cannot provide any estate planning protections to you or your
family during your lifetime.
Testamentary trusts are created in wills and like wills they are court
supervised as part of the required probate court proceedings. This
supervision continues until the probate is ended. This means that if you
created a testamentary trust to manage assets for your children until
they turned thirty years old, your family would have to deal with
probate court proceedings year after year until your youngest child
turned thirty. The best estate planning attorneys seldom use
testamentary trusts because of this negative consequence. Instead,
“Living Trusts” are the legal tool of choice for the estate planning
needs of most people.
Living Trusts are a special type of trust that go into legal effect
immediately upon their signing, i.e., when the Trustmaker is still
alive. They are also known as “inter vivos” trusts, which means “during
life” in Latin. This distinguishes them from testamentary trusts, which,
as discussed above, become legally effective only after the Trustmaker
dies. Living Trusts therefore offer lifetime planning opportunities
(such as instructions on how to manage one’s property if one becomes
disabled) that simply cannot be had with a testamentary trust which take
effect when it is too late.
Living Trusts are increasingly being used as the ideal solution for
those who no longer want to expose themselves to the dangers of joint
tenancy or force the estate to go through probate with a will. There are
so many advantages to using trusts that recent studies report that up to
half of all people who now plan their estates are using trusts instead
of wills.
We are not surprised by this trend. The advantages of a properly
designed and funded Living Trust include the ability to plan for a
possible disability, legitimate tax avoidance, asset protection for the
surviving spouse, individualized planning to protect your spouse and
children, enhanced privacy, and probate avoidance. Also, because a
properly drafted Living Trust can own any type of stock and participate
in partnerships and limited liability companies, they can be used to
help smoothly transfer the family business to the next generation. If
you own a small business, a Living Trust can enhance your business
succession planning.
Furthermore, with a Living Trust one can still take advantage of the
probate process if desired. The difference is that with a Living Trust
the family has the choice of deciding whether probate court proceedings
have any benefit – it is not forced into probate as happens to those who
fail to plan or plan with simple wills.
Living trusts also come in several different types. The most commonly
used living trust today is the “Revocable Living Trust”.
The term, “revocable,” means that the instructions of these trusts
can be amended whenever the Trustmaker desires. These trusts are popular
because they provide the Trustmaker the maximum flexibility in
controlling the trust assets and the ability to change the plan whenever
desired. While parents are alive and healthy, they act as the trust’s
Trustee and have total control over the property in it; however, if one
or both parents suffer a disability, the trust’s detailed instructions
state how the parents should be cared for and how property held in the
trust should be managed. Additional instructions state how the children
and other loved ones should be cared for after the parents die. Since
these trusts are “revocable,” their instructions can be changed or
canceled at any time so long as the Trustmaker is still legally
competent. Also, property can be place into or removed from the trust
anytime the Trust maker desires.
If you create a trust, you will need to decide what property of yours
should be placed into your trust so that your trust assumes legal
control over it. Property is placed into to a trust simply by changing
its title to name the trust as its legal owner. This process of changing
title is called “funding” the trust.
Almost any type of property can be funded into a trust. The funding
process consists of simply signing documents that name the trust as the
new owner of your property. For example, some assets such as real
estate, are funded into a trust by preparing and signing a new deed that
names the trust as the new owner.
Other assets such as savings accounts, are funded into a trust by
signing a new signature card that names the trust as the new owner of
the account. Still other assets (personal property including household
furnishings, jewelry, etc.), are funded into a trust by signing a
document known as an “assignment” that names the trust as its new owner.
Funding a trust takes a little work, but it is well worth the effort
for one very important reason: the Trustee has legal control only over
property titled in the trust’s name. Any property not titled in the name
of the trust is never legally owned by it and property not owned by the
trust is in danger of having to be probated when its owner dies;
however, property that is properly titled in the name of the trust never
has to go through probate court because trusts never die!
If the funding process sounds confusing to you, thinking of it in
another way might help. Some have described a Revocable Living Trust as
a “magic box” in which you place all of the titles to your property. You
just open the top of the box and place in it the deed to the house, the
car, the checking account, the investment account, and anything else
desired. Since you can name yourself as the Trustee of your own trust,
you will maintain legal control over everything you put into your magic
box. At any time you want you can just reach into the box and take out
the title to any asset and do with it as you please. You can sell,
trade, invest, or give it away just as if you never had a trust. And at
your death, it is as if the magic box is automatically handed to your
designated successor trustee to administer your property according to
your instructions. All this happens without your property being
probated.
The instructions contained in a Revocable Living Trust are limited
only by the imagination and creativity of the Trustmaker. Nonetheless,
most trusts will contain several important instructions including who
will serve as Successor Trustee, what happens if a Trustmaker becomes
disabled, and who will benefit from the trust after the Trustmaker dies.
Some of the most important instructions in Revocable Living Trusts
pertain to who will replace the Trustmaker if the Trustmaker can no
longer serve as a Trustee because of disability or death. The Successor
Trustee will assume the legal responsibility of managing the trust’s
assets according to its instructions. Accordingly, the Successor Trustee
must be exceptionally trustworthy, excel at managing property of
considerable value, and be capable of following detailed legal
instructions. A detailed discussion of a Trustee’s responsibilities is
presented in the chapters that follow.
While it is impossible to
plan for one’s possible disability in a will, a Revocable Living Trust
is the ideal legal tool for this important planning need. On any given
day, a person has a seven times greater chance of becoming disabled than
of dying. We feel that a Revocable Living Trust is not complete unless
it contains instructions for the possibility that the Trustmaker may
become disabled.
For example, many of our clients tell us that if they become disabled
they want to be cared for in their homes as long as medically feasible.
In such instances, the trust can contain individualized disability
instructions such as the following:
• Authority to use trust assets to maintain the home so long as it is
occupied and to retrofit it for handicapped accessibility if necessary;
• Authority to pay for services such as visiting nurses, twenty-four
hour care, hospice, and other needed caregivers to make staying at home
a reality; and
• A statement of the desire to participate in normal activities of daily
life to the maximum extent possible including outings, recreation,
travel, and religious or spiritual involvement.
Detailed instructions can be included in your trust that will enable
you to leave what you want, to whom you want, when you want, and in the
way you want just as if you were still alive and personally giving those
instructions. You can be as creative as you desire and specify the
conditions and timing of distributions to your loved ones. For example,
if your children are minors, you can leave detailed instructions that
inform the Trustee how to use trust assets to raise your children and
the preferred type of schooling to provide for them.
Alternately, your living trust can be drafted to benefit any number of
people in exactly the way you want. Possibilities include friends,
grandchildren, or even charities. Such planning can be designed to
benefit them immediately or even over a period of several generations.
There are several other
benefits of having a Revocable Living Trust. These include the
following:
• Revocable Living Trusts are private documents that do not require
court approval. Your beneficiaries will not have to wait for court
permission to approve distributions of trust property. Outsiders and
potential predators will also be prevented from learning the terms of
your estate plan and using the knowledge against your loved ones.
• Court challenges to wills are successfull 25% of the time. A
Living Trust is more difficult to attack partly because its instructions
are not readily available to relatives or others who might not be happy
with these instructions.
• A Living Trust can hold property owned by a family in more than one
state and save the family the cost and difficulty of conducting probates
in multiple states.
For all these reasons and many others, Revocable Living Trusts are the
legal tools that we find most often best accomplish our client’s
planning goals.
Is there anything else about Revocable Living Trusts important to
know?
There are two misconceptions about Revocable Living Trusts that are
important to know. The first is a mistaken belief by some that putting
your property in a Revocable Living Trust will protect it from
creditors. This is simply not true. If you retain the legal right to use
the property in your trust however you please, your creditors can go
after it. While there do exist some types of trusts that provide some
creditor protection for the beneficiary, Revocable Living Trusts do not
fall into that category.
Revocable trusts are not asset protection devices and placing your
property in a Revocable Living Trust will not protect it from being
seized by legitimate creditors. The assets in a trust remain “countable”
for Medicaid purposes so they do not protect your assets from being used
for nursing home care.
A second misconception about Revocable Living Trusts is that they can be
used to avoid income taxes. Again, this is not true. Placing your
property in a Revocable Living Trust will not change your personal
income tax status or obtain for you any favorable income tax advantages.
For income tax purposes, the IRS will continue to treat the property as
if you still individually own it.
Unscrupulous individuals sometimes promote these misconceptions about
living trusts in an attempt to sell trust forms or other services and
make a quick profit. Do not believe them.
Revocable Living Trusts are excellent tools for avoiding costly
guardianship hearings, probate proceedings, and legal fees and costs.
Drafted correctly, they can help your family legitimately avoid estate
taxes and keep you in control of your property to benefit you and your
loved ones. In order to obtain these benefits, you need and deserve the
quality legal advice available only from a qualified estate planning
attorney.
If you fail to leave instructions for how your children are to be
taken care of in the event of your death, some stranger in a probate
court will make those decisions for you. No one knows or loves your
children more than you. No one knows better than you their individual
needs and how to best protect them. Why would you leave such important
decisions to strangers?
Back to Top
When planning for minors, typically our clients ask us four major
questions:
• How can I best make gifts to minor children during my lifetime?
• Who should be named my child’s guardian if I suffer an untimely death?
• How should I leave property to my children if they are still minors
when I die?
• How can I plan for a child who is disabled or has other supplemental
needs?
Planning in this area involves far more than mere economics. It involves
creating an environment that will allow underage children to experience
both loving care and economic security as they grow into adulthood. This
planning should begin while we are still alive. One estate planning
opportunity we have is our ability to make lifetime gifts to our
children.
When planning their estates, many parents and grandparents want to learn
the best way they can make lifetime gifts to children or grandchildren.
These gifts are usually intended to build a college fund for the child
while also reducing the donor’s taxable estate. Although these parents
and grandparents are to be commended for their proactive approach to
protecting their loved ones, there are several pitfalls for the unwary
in such lifetime planning.
Financial professionals often advise parents to establish custodial
accounts for minors under the Uniform Transfer to Minors Act (UTMA).
These accounts are easy to recommend because they are easy to establish
and require few formal documents. The problem with this recommendation
is that the child will be given all of the account assets when he or she
turns twenty-one.
There is nothing magical about reaching one’s twenty-first birthday. Not
all children are financially mature at that age and many need further
guidance. If there are substantial sums in the account, the biggest
question many children often face is, “What color should the Porsche
be?” Some of the best parents in the world have raised children who
cannot handle money. This lack of control is a major drawback that makes
an UTMA definitely not the right vehicle for the parent or grandparent
who desires to guide the child’s use of the assets.
If you want to retain control over how and when distributions are made
from a child’s account, a Minor’s Demand Trust is an excellent option
that should be explored. With a Minor’s Demand Trust, the parent or
grandparent retains control over how the trust assets can be used while
still escaping gift taxes that would otherwise be due. To accomplish
this two requirements must be met. First, annual gifts are made that are
kept under the annual gift tax exemption. Second, each time a gift is
made the minor is given the legal right to demand the gift during a
specified period of time (a window of opportunity). This withdrawal
right poses no particular problem because, since the child is still a
minor when the gift is made, it is of course the parent who decides
whether to exercise the child’s withdrawal right. The parent can simply
waive the demand right and instead invest the funds for the child’s
future needs.
Another benefit of a Minor’s Demand Trust is that distributions are not
limited to educational needs. The Trustee can use trust assets for the
benefit of the child as desired or deemed appropriate.
Back to Top
Perhaps no issue is more difficult for parents to address than who
will take care of the children if the parents are unable to care for the
children themselves. This question is so important that we have devoted
the entire next chapter to it.
Once you decide how to best
make lifetime gifts to provide for a child’s future educational needs
and financial security, and determine who will be the child’s guardian,
the next step is to protect the inheritance. A “simple will,” suggested
by some attorneys, is not an adequate tool for this important task.
Such “simple wills” can subject your children to unnecessary and
intrusive court proceedings, excessive costs, lost privacy and extended
delays. Moreover, with ongoing court proceedings, every trip to the
attorney’s office or courthouse reminds the children of their loss.
Instead of accepting such questionable advice, consider consulting an
experienced estate planning attorney who can efficiently and creatively
set up a Living Trust that incorporates your most cherished values,
hopes, wishes, dreams and aspirations for your minor children.
A major planning difficulty we often see stems from the desire of many
parents to treat all of their children equally. As a result of this
desire, it is not uncommon for parents to divide their estates into
equal separate shares for each child. While this simplistic approach
sounds equitable, it can lead to drastically unfair results. What is
fair is not always what is equal. The truth of this is seen in how most
of us raise our children.
When asked, most parents admit that they do not use a ledger to keep
track of money spent on each child. For example, if one child displays
musical talent most parents would not hesitate to invest in piano
lessons and even buy a piano if the family can afford it. Having made
such a large investment for one child, they do not immediately give an
equal amount to the other less talented children.
The problem with taking an automatic “equal division” approach in
planning your estate is that it imposes a rigid one-size-fits-all plan
on the children regardless of their age, economic circumstances, or
their individual needs, strengths and weaknesses. Of course we all love
our children equally but we should never fail to plan for them as
individuals.
In our experience, the use of a “Common Trust” for minor children more
closely mirrors the flexibility that parents use in raising their
children. A Common Trust comes into effect upon the deaths of both
parents. The alternatives in design are almost endless, but the
cornerstone of every Common Trust is to provide for all your children’s
needs from a common source just as if you were still alive. Authors and
preeminent estate planning attorneys, Robert A. Esperti and Renno L.
Peterson, have aptly nicknamed this kind of trust a “soup-pot trust” and
describe it as follows:
“Can you recall your mom’s soup specialty? If it was like our moms’, it
had just about everything in the pantry and refrigerator in it. When it
was ladled out, the hungrier children at the table got more than those
who weren’t as hungry. Some got more meat, because it was their
favorite; some got more vegetables or rice or noodles. If a particular
brother or sister had a penchant for a particular ingredient, that
ingredient was always found in abundance in his or her bowl. Mom
controlled and monitored the whole process to make sure that everyone
was nourished and as happy as possible, and she ultimately decided who
got what.” (Esperti and Peterson, Loving Trust, Viking Penguin, 1994).
In an estate plan that incorporates a Common Trust, the Trustee serves
as the “mom” in the soup story told above. The Trustee decides who gets
what based upon the individual present and anticipated needs and desires
of the children and the available trust assets. Since the Trustee’s job
is to follow the Trust’s instructions, it is a good idea that those who
desire to incorporate a Common Trust into their estate plan give their
Trustee guidance as to the specific needs of each child.
While it is a good idea to place assets in a common trust while the
children are young, at some point the trust will have fulfilled its
purpose and it becomes time to distribute whatever remains to the now
older, and hopefully mature, children. The question then becomes, “What
is the right time to end the Common Trust?” While this is an individual
decision based on the family situation, most common trusts contain
instructions that state that the Trustee should keep funds in the Common
Trust until the youngest child reaches a certain age or finishes
college. If the Common Trust were ended and the assets distributed when
the oldest child reaches a certain age or finishes college, the youngest
child could be deprived of the opportunity to receive Trust assets for
education or other needs. It is much more equitable to keep the Common
Trust intact until the youngest child receives the same level of care
that was given to older siblings.
To alleviate the danger that the older children may feel that they are
being punished by having their inheritance delayed until a much younger
sibling grows up, trust instructions can be included that allow the
trustee to advance money or property to an older child for extraordinary
needs or opportunities. This “advancement” is then taken out of that
child’s share when the Common Trust is terminated and the assets
distributed among the children.
Another good idea to use in planning for your children is to build
incentives into the Trust to motivate the child to live responsibly and
develop good work habits. For example, incentives can be drafted that
reward the children for maintaining a good grade point average,
graduating from college, that assist with a down payment on a home, or
match earned income among many other possible incentives. The
possibilities for designing incentives that are individually tailored
for the needs of your children are limitless.
When the time comes for the Common Trust to be divided, there are two
main options. One can decide that all of the trust assets should be
immediately divided and distributed outright to the children to do with
as they please. This option is appropriate if the children are all
older, leading successful lives, and the parent does not feel the need
to protect the inheritance for a variety of reasons. Alternately,
instead of just surrendering total control of the inheritance to the
children, the parent can decide to keep each child’s inheritance in a
protective trust established specifically for that child. These
protective trusts contain instructions for the management and
distribution of trust assets tailored to the individual needs of a
specific child. Again, the possibilities and alternatives for designing
these trusts are endless.
Property can be kept in trust for a beneficiary’s entire lifetime. In
this situation a trustee is appointed to decide when and how much of the
trust assets to distribute. This type of planning makes sense not only
if a child has spendthrift tendencies or a drug or alcohol problem, but
the trust can also provide protection for your child from a failed
marriage or claims of creditors.
If you have a child who will never be able to handle money, keeping that
child’s inheritance in the trust with instructions to the Trustee to
provide for his or her health, education, maintenance, and support would
be a wise and loving choice.
Alternately, a parent can decide to space trust distributions over
several years. This prevents children from misspending the entire
inheritance all at once by giving them time to mature. The last thing a
parent wants is to destroy a child with an inheritance.
If your child has reached maturity and is fiscally responsible, the
trust instructions can be quite flexible and allow
withdrawal of trust funds whenever he or she wants. Although the child
has access to the funds, if properly drafted, the Trust will protect the
inheritance from creditor claims, lawsuits, and divorcing spouses. In
our litigious and divorce-prone society, such protections are becoming
increasingly necessary.
Unfortunately, in some families a child may never be able to provide for
himself or herself due to a physical or mental disability or some other
special need. In these cases special planning is needed for the special
child.
The most effective way to make sure a special needs child is properly
provided for upon your death is to create a Special Needs Trust for
them. A Special Needs Trust is administered by a trustee whose duty is
to provide for the financial and medical needs of the special child in
accordance with the written instructions in the trust. A Special Needs
Trust will protect the assets you leave for the use of the child from
the unscrupulous. A minor may also need a guardian who will oversee the
child’s emotional, religious, and social needs.
A Special Needs Trust can be drafted to meet the needs of the
individual child. The instructions in the Special Needs Trust should
also be designed so that the child does not become ineligible to receive
federal or state benefits to which the child may be entitled. This can
be accomplished if the trustee’s power is discretionary and the trustee
can withhold or distribute funds depending on the child’s condition and
the availability of state or federal funds, within the restrictions
imposed by state and federal law.
The Special Needs Trust may contain instructions that surplus income may
be accumulated if necessary to avoid
disqualification for government benefits. The trust should also contain
provisions that prohibit the child from transferring income or principal
of the trust to any person.
A Special Needs Trust can also be created to provide for the needs of
an adult who is unable to care for himself or herself. All of the
previously addressed issues relating to a Special Needs Trust for a
child also apply to a Special Needs Trust created for an adult.
In planning for children there are two main questions that one must
ask. The first question is, “Who will take care of my children’s
physical needs?” This is the role of a Guardian. The second question is,
“Who will be responsible for managing the children’s inheritance until
they are mature enough to manage it themselves?” This is the role of a
Trustee. While the roles of a guardian and a trustee are both important,
they require different skills. In order to pick the right person for the
right job, it is important to know the duties each performs.
A guardian is responsible for caring for the physical needs of minor
children, or adults who are disabled. They make decisions involving
basic needs such as housing, clothing, medical care, and schooling. For
minors, the Guardian is the person who will tuck your child in at night.
For disabled adults, the Guardian is the person who decides if they can
be cared for at home or if their condition requires placement in a group
home, assisted living facility or nursing home.
Choosing a guardian for minors is perhaps the most difficult decision
a parent has to make because it is nearly impossible to imagine anyone
else doing as good a job as you would do raising your children, however,
as pointed out earlier, if you do not choose a guardian for your
children, a judge who has no personal knowledge of you or your children
will decide who will raise them. Don’t allow yourself to become
paralyzed trying to find someone who will be as good a parent as you
are. That person does not exist. Instead, focus on finding the next best
person available.
In choosing a guardian for minor children, it is important that you name
someone who shares your ideas and values in rearing children. Ask
yourself if you and the person you are considering share similar
religious beliefs and attitudes toward parental discipline. Ask yourself
if they will give your children the same loving care that you give them
and will seek to provide them with the same educational opportunities
that you would provide.
Another factor that must be considered is the proposed guardian’s age. A
guardian must not be so young or old that they are unable to care for or
cope with very young, adolescent, or teenage children. While age is an
important consideration, a number of good candidates are often
overlooked merely as a result of their age. Age may be a deciding factor
among equally qualified candidates, but it should not automatically
disqualify an otherwise appropriate selection.
Many young parents operate under the false assumption that a guardian
must be their age or younger. Age has often been cited as a reason not
to nominate grandparents or others as guardians but a healthy, loving
relationship that already exists between children and a potential
guardian is the single most important factor to consider when choosing a
guardian. If you believe your child would receive love, nurturing, and
care from a particular person, that single factor might outweigh any
negatives such as age or relocation. In many cultures, the older members
of extended families often help to raise children. Moreover,
grandparents who are overlooked might contest your appointment in court,
especially if individuals from outside the family are named.
Also consider the proposed guardian’s ability to financially care for
your children. If the guardian is not financially equipped to care for
your children it may cause an undue burden on the guardian’s family and
lead to resentment against your children. For this reason, it is wise to
consider leaving financial assistance to the guardian to help raise your
minor children or help provide for a disabled adult.
You should also consider whether you would want your child raised by a
single parent or by a married couple. If you name a couple, you should
clearly state what you would want to happen if there is a death or
divorce between the guardians.
Another factor that should be considered in selecting guardians is
whether they have children of their own. If they do, ask yourself
whether their children will be good playmates for yours. Also ask
whether parents who already have children of their own will be able to
handle the additional burden, especially since your children may have
emotional problems that will require a lot of individual care and
attention. Because of these issues, you should not automatically rule
out individuals whose children are already grown or who have no
children. Sometimes a family with children may better serve as a support
network in which all the children can remain friends rather than become
sibling rivals.
All of the above issues should be thoroughly discussed with the proposed
guardian in order to ensure that the person you select is qualified and
to make sure he or she is willing and able to serve. Also, in addition
to the primary person you would like to serve as Guardian, it is always
a good idea to name a backup in case the first person selected is unable
to serve. This person is known as a “successor guardian,” and can serve
if you decide to replace the primary guardian or if the primary guardian
is unable or refuses to serve when needed.
You may nominate a guardian for your children in your will. Wills are
the legal tool used because the guardian appointment is officially made
in probate court. For this reason, individuals who plan their estate
with a living trust will also usually have a will drafted to nominate a
guardian for their minor children.
Since guardians are nominated in a will, the nominated guardian can be
replaced simply by signing a new will that nominates a new guardian.
Accordingly, a guardian can be changed at any time prior to the
disability or death of both parents. After the death of both parents,
the guardian can be changed only by court order. Therefore, the
appointment of a guardian should be reevaluated on a regular basis as
your family needs change and the needs and circumstance of the nominated
guardian change.
Once a parent has decided whom to appoint to take care of a child’s
physical needs, it is next necessary to decide who will be responsible
for managing the child’s inheritance until he or she is mature enough to
manage it. As stated before, this is the responsibility of a Successor
Trustee who starts managing the trust if the parent becomes disabled or
dies.
It is important to name a Successor Trustee to prevent the family
from having to go through court proceedings to appoint a new Trustee if
the Trustmaker is no longer able to serve due to disability or death.
The Trustmaker should discuss the appointment with the person to be
named so that person will be aware of the duties and responsibilities of
a Successor Trustee when the Trustmaker can no longer serve.
A Successor Trustee’s most important duty is to implement the Trust’s
instructions concerning how the trust property should be used to aid the
beneficiaries. Whereas guardians decide how to take care of a
beneficiary’s physical needs, the Successor Trustee decides how to use
trust assets to pay for those needs. Among other responsibilities, a
Successor Trustee has the following responsibilities:
• Making an inventory of trust assets;
• Protecting trust assets and making sure they are properly invested;
• Preparing an accounting for beneficiaries;
• Implementing the Trust’s instructions as to how trust assets are to be
distributed to the beneficiaries or otherwise used for their benefit.
The Successor Trustee need not make these decisions alone. The trust
authorizes the Successor Trustee to obtain whatever professional
services are necessary to carry out the trust’s instructions. Such
professionals may include investment advisors, attorneys, insurance
agents or certified public accountants.
Each state has statutory guidelines that regulate a trustee’s
responsibilities. Trustees must use reasonable business judgment in the
investment, management, and diversification of the trust assets, taking
into account the needs of the beneficiaries. Additionally, trustees must
not allow trust assets to be wasted or invest money or other property in
speculative or other imprudent investments.
A Successor Trustee can be any adult. Possible candidates include
family members or friends. Alternately, the services of a professional
trustee can be retained. These include attorneys, certified public
accountants, and trust companies or the trust department of a bank.
Selection of a trustee is an important decision and each alternative has
advantages and disadvantages.
An advantage of selecting family members or friends as Successor
Trustees is that they have personal knowledge of the family. Their
knowledge of the true needs of the beneficiaries can prove valuable.
They can also generally be trusted to act in the beneficiary’s best
interest and usually will serve for little or no fee. The disadvantages
of family members or friends serving as Successor Trustees is that they
may make decisions on an emotional, rather than objective basis, and
they often lack the financial skills necessary to invest and manage
large sums of money.
Professional advisers, such as attorneys, CPAs, or financial advisers
generally have expertise in finances and knowledge of the legal
requirements of trust management. They also usually carry professional
liability insurance that financially protects your beneficiaries if
mismanagement of trust assets occurs. What professional trustees possess
in financial and legal expertise they lack in knowledge of the
Trustmaker’s family and goals and, with their professional skills come
higher fees. Even so, higher fees should not necessarily be a
determining factor in choosing a trustee. A professional’s fees are
often more than compensated for by their ability to obtain for
beneficiaries a better return on trust investments.
Trust companies or bank trust departments have substantial expertise
in serving as trustees, are highly regulated by state and federal
agencies, and have the financial resources to pay for costly mistakes.
The disadvantages of corporate trustees serving as Successor Trustees,
as with other professionals, include their higher fees, their lack of
knowledge of the Trustmaker’s family, and the fact that they are often
seen as uncaring and dispassionate. Including instructions in the trust
that permit the trustee to be replaced if appropriate can mitigate some
of these disadvantages.
The Trustmaker of a revocable trust can change a trustee at any time
prior to his or her disability or death by amending the trust to name a
new Successor Trustee. The trust can also include instructions that
outline the circumstances that allow a Successor Trustee to be removed.
For example, the trust may provide that a majority of the beneficiaries
can appoint a new Successor Trustee for specific reasons or for no
reason at all. Also, there does not have to be just one Successor
Trustee named. Multiple Successor Trustees may be named to serve
simultaneously.
The decision to choose more than one Successor Trustee to serve
simultaneously may be based on several factors. Often one person
possesses all the necessary skills to serve alone. If this is not the
case, co-trustees can be appointed and trust responsibilities divided
between them. For example, the Trustee that personally knows the
beneficiaries the best can be assigned the responsibility of deciding
when to distribute trust assets for their benefit. The Trustee that is
most adept at financial matters can be assigned the responsibility for
deciding how to invest trust assets. If co-trustees are appointed, the
trust agreement should state the specific responsibilities of each
Trustee and how joint decisions are to be made.
Another benefit of naming multiple co-trustees is that if one of them
resigns, becomes disabled, or dies, the other co-trustee is already in
place to continue the trust administration without any interruption.
Without this protection, the beneficiaries must deal with the burden of
deciding whom to appoint as a Successor Trustee.
A final benefit of naming co-trustees is that they can monitor each
other so that trust assets are managed and distributed as the Trustmaker
intended. Many believe that it is simply good policy to make sure that
multiple individuals are jointly responsible for the trust’s
administration as it can help prevent the mismanagement, misuse, or
theft of the trust’s assets.
In a Power of Attorney you, “the principal,” name a chosen “agent” to
exercise legal authority on your behalf the same as if you were doing it
yourself. The authority granted can be whatever rights you desire the
agent to exercise over your legal affairs and your property. Such
authority can include making deposits and withdrawals from your bank
accounts, managing your investments, selling your home, or anything else
you could do yourself.
Typically such Powers of Attorney take legal effect immediately. Also,
the legal authority granted the agent in all Powers of Attorney
terminates at the principal’s death and usually also terminates if the
principal becomes mentally disabled.
As stated above, the legal authority granted your agent to act for
you in most Powers of Attorney automatically terminates if you become
mentally disabled; thus a Power of Attorney can become useless exactly
when it is needed the most. For this reason, many Powers of Attorney
contain language that makes them “durable” so that the legal authority
granted the agent continues even if the principal becomes disabled.
With a Durable Power of Attorney, your agent will continue to have the
legal authority to make decisions for you regardless of any subsequent
illness, accident or other disabling condition you suffer.
The granting of such legal authority to others is one way that an
individual can avoid otherwise necessary guardianship court proceedings.
The ability of the family to prevent court proceedings by having a
Powers of Attorney in place, and the relatively low cost in having an
attorney draft one, makes Powers of Attorney a popular estate planning
tool.
Although Powers of Attorney may be inexpensive to set up initially,
they tend to suffer from a number of shortcomings. First, if you believe
that an important element of estate planning is to maintain control of
your property while you are alive and well, the traditional Power of
Attorney might not be acceptable to you because most Powers of Attorney
give the agent immediate legal power to act on your behalf even though
you neither presently need nor want any help.
This shortcoming can be avoided by using a “Springing” Power of
Attorney. Unlike most Powers of Attorney that give the agent the right
to act for you immediately, a Springing Power of Attorney allows the
agent to act for you only after you become disabled.
Second, even the best Power of Attorney may not work just when you need
it the most – when you become disabled and can no longer legally make
your own financial decisions. This shortcoming occurs with great
frequency because many banks and other financial institutions are
extremely rigid and will accept only their own in-house Power of
Attorney. They simply refuse to accept a Power of Attorney drafted by
anyone other than their own attorney.
Moreover, just the mere passage of time from the date you sign your
Power of Attorney until the time it is used by your agent, may be enough
to cause problems. Financial institutions are often concerned that the
passage of time has rendered your Power of Attorney “stale.” An old
Power of Attorney runs the risk of becoming stale due to the possibility
that many things may have changed in your life since you signed it and
the Power no longer truly reflects your present desires.
Rather than risk a lawsuit by honoring a stale Power of Attorney, the
financial institution may require a court to establish the validity of
the Power of Attorney. Although in most circumstances your agent will
win in court, your family will have lost because the whole point of
having a Power of Attorney was to avoid a trip to the courthouse in the
first place. This problem with “stale” Powers of Attorney is why it is
sound advice to update them every couple years, or even more often.
A third shortcoming of Financial Powers of Attorney often arises when
not enough legal authority is granted the agent. For example, the
typical Power of Attorney gives your agent control over all your assets,
including the right to sell your real estate but the document is
entirely silent about the agent’s legal ability to use the proceeds of
that sale for your benefit.
It is important to leave detailed instructions about how the proceeds
from the sale of your property are to be used if you are disabled. Are
such proceeds to be used only for your own benefit?
Or alternately, is your agent authorized to also use them to take care
of others that you are currently helping, such as aging parents or your
minor or adult children who may find themselves in financial or medical
difficulties? While such instructions in a Power of Attorney give needed
authority to your agent, they simultaneously contribute to the
difficulty of getting a financial institution or other third party to
honor it.
Conversely, a fourth shortcoming of Financial Powers of Attorney is the
danger of giving the agent too much legal authority. Unfortunately, the
legal treatises are full of instances where agents used their power to
wrongfully abscond with all of the principal’s property.
For all of the above reasons, although Powers of Attorney offer valuable
estate-planning opportunities, they also embody several significant
shortcomings. Foremost among these is that they dangerously grant the
agent broad legal authority over the principal’s property with little in
the way of detailed instructions or restrictions to prevent the abuse of
that power. The reality is that many times Powers of Attorney are used
in an attempt to accomplish more than is wise or prudent.
Fortunately, there is a ready solution to this dilemma. Instead of using
Powers of Attorney to grant an agent legal authority to do everything
imaginable, a much better approach is to use a Power of Attorney that
grants only limited authority in conjunction with a comprehensive estate
plan that has at its center a Revocable Living Trust.
Powers of Attorney created for limited and specific purposes can be of
great value in estate planning when used with a Revocable Living Trust.
For example, as the estate planning centerpiece, the Revocable Living
Trust will accomplish what it is expressly designed to do – help the
estate escape guardianship proceedings while also providing the Trustee
with detailed instructions that authorize only appropriate use of trust
funds to help you and your loved ones and no one else.
The Power of Attorney then supplements this authority by authorizing the
agent to handle any property or legal issue not controlled by the trust.
Such legal issues could include representing you if you become injured
in an automobile accident, advocating for you before government
agencies, and dealing with insurance or retirement account issues. Other
limited powers could include the authority to transfer assets to your
trust but not give them away. Using a Revocable Living Trust with a
Power of Attorney, you will be more secure in the knowledge that the
instructions you leave will actually work as you intend without court
intervention or the risk of being victimized by an unscrupulous agent.
All states have laws that authorize you to create a special Power of
Attorney in which you designate an agent to make health care decisions
for you if you are unable to do so yourself. These Healthcare Powers of
Attorney can also be used to provide instructions to your agent
concerning the type of care you do or do not want to receive if
disabled, seriously ill, or injured.
It is important to get professional advice when preparing a Healthcare
Power of Attorney because each state has its own requirements for how
the document is to be signed, how many agents may be used at any given
time, and restrictions on the types of medical decisions that may or may
not be made by an agent. Also, because the person you appoint as your
healthcare agent could literally have life and death decision-making
authority over you, selection of an agent should be done with the utmost
care.
The person you select for your health care agent should be someone who
not only knows you well, but also understands your views about
continuing health care in circumstances where you are terminally ill or
suffering from a permanent loss of consciousness. Remember, these are
decisions of the heart and don’t necessarily require the same financial
skills you might want to see in a trustee. In fact, the person who is
the best with a dollar may be the very last person you would want making
these life and death decisions for you.
Your spouse, other family members, or close friends are usually good
candidates to be the health care agent. But whomever you chose, it is
important that you thoroughly discuss with your agent your desires
concerning whether you should receive or refuse healthcare services
under various situations.
Your estate planning attorney should be able to provide you with a list
of questions that address these issues to go over with your intended
healthcare agent.
In addition to statutes authorizing you to appoint a healthcare
agent, most states have statutes that authorize you to leave
instructions concerning the specific types of treatments you do or do
not want to receive. These instructions are generically known as “Living
Wills,” and in some states known by their more technical legal
definition, “Declarations To Physicians.”
Living Wills, in essence, are intended to provide you with a way to
express in advance your desires concerning your health care treatment.
They are mainly used by those who desire to authorize the withdrawal of
life sustaining care if their treating physician’s medical diagnosis is
that continuing healthcare is simply prolonging their life without hope
of meaningful recovery. Living Wills can also be used equally well to
provide instructions about the types of medical treatment the patient
does not want withheld or withdrawn.
Ordinarily, Living Wills require the agreement of two physicians that
the conditions you have set to withdraw care have occurred. For example,
before they could “pull the plug”, two physicians would have to agree
that you are suffering from a terminal condition or that you are in a
“persistent vegetative state.”
Recently, there has been a good deal of concern that health
professionals frequently do not follow the directives contained in
Living Wills because either the healthcare professionals did not know
the patient had a Living Will or because the patient’s instructions were
ignored under a “doctor knows best” philosophy. Also, in most states the
care instructions provided in a Healthcare Power of Attorney override
the instructions left in a Living Will if the two conflict with each
other.
For these reasons, many estate planners recommend that the primary
healthcare directive be the appointment of a specific healthcare agent
in a Healthcare Power of Attorney. A handpicked agent serving as your
healthcare advocate could make the difference between whether your
healthcare instructions will be followed or not.
On the other hand, some estate planners argue that also having a Living
Will in place can provide needed instructions if your healthcare agent,
for any reason, is unable to serve. This is usually not a problem
because of your ability to appoint successor healthcare agents if the
first one named does not serve. Ultimately, the decision whether to have
one or both documents is an important issue to discuss with your estate
planning attorney.
Many of our clients spend portions of the year in different states. If
you live part-time in another state you may wish to have your healthcare
directives prepared in each of your states of residence. Health care
directives are mostly state specific. If you desire to have your wishes
carried out no matter where you are if you become ill or injured, it is
advisable to have a healthcare directive that complies with the law of
all states where you reside a significant portion of the year.
Also, it is important to let others know that you have healthcare
directives. Once prepared and signed, you should give copies of your
healthcare directives to your chosen agents as well as your family
physician. There are also professional services, such as Docubank or
U.S. Living Will Registry, that offer twenty-four hour worldwide faxing
of your healthcare directives with only a phone call. Your estate
planning attorney can help arrange for these services if desired.
You should also ask your estate planning attorney if there are any other
unusual provisions in your state’s laws of which you should be made
aware. For example, in some states you may be able to obtain a “do not
resuscitate” bracelet that instructs paramedics and other healthcare
professionals that you do not want to receive resuscitation services if
you cannot communicate that desire yourself.
Congress enacted the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996 (HIPAA) to protect your healthcare information. The primary
objective is to ensure the electronic transmission of health care
information between insurance companies remains private. A consequence
of these strict privacy rules is that your healthcare provider may be
prevented from sharing healthcare information with your loved ones.
HIPAA imposes significant penalties on health care providers who release
your information without proper authorization. To avoid a situation
where your family is unable to obtain necessary healthcare information
when an emergency arises, it is imperative that you have a Healthcare
Power of Attorney.
The way your property is classified is important because there are
several estate planning advantages for married couples that own property
in a community property state that do not exist for couples living in
separate property states. The first involves a capital gains tax
benefit.
Couples that own community property that has appreciated in value, and
for which a capital gains tax would ordinarily be due when it is sold,
receive what is known as a double step-up in its tax basis at the death
of the first spouse. The benefit of this double step-up in basis becomes
apparent when one calculates the capital gains taxes otherwise due as a
result of the property’s appreciation. The double step-up in tax basis
will quite often enable the surviving spouse to escape capital gains
taxes entirely because the starting point in calculating the property’s
appreciation is the date of the first spouse’s death—not the date the
couple originally purchased the property. Assets sold immediately after
the death of the first spouse will show no taxable appreciation.
A brief example shows how this works. Suppose a married couple in a
separate property state jointly owned some stock they had purchased ten
years ago for two dollars. The two dollars becomes the starting point,
or tax “basis,” for calculating any taxable appreciation in the stock’s
value. Let’s say that during those ten years the stock appreciated in
value to twenty dollars. If the stock were sold while both spouses were
living, a capital gains tax would be imposed on the eighteen dollars
profit.
Now assume the husband of that couple died before the sale. If the
jointly owned stock was sold after his death, the tax laws give a
step-up in basis for the decedent husband’s half of the property, but no
step-up for the surviving wife’s share. This means that if the stock
were sold for twenty dollars the day after the husband died, there would
be a step-up in basis from one dollar (the husband’s one-half of the
original two-dollar basis) to ten dollars (his one-half of the twenty
dollar sale price). But no step-up occurs on his surviving wife’s half
interest. Accordingly, upon the sale she will be required to pay a
capital gains tax on the nine dollars profit attributable to her half of
the stock.
Compare this to the result that would occur if the couple lived in a
community property state where they would own the stock together as
community property. When the husband died, not only would his half of
the property receive a step-up in basis but hers would be stepped up as
well, even though she is still living. This is the meaning of the term
double step-up in basis. Due to this double step-up in basis, the
property’s tax basis becomes its fair market value on the date of the
husband’s death. If the property’s basis is twenty dollars when the
husband dies, and the wife thereafter sells it for twenty dollars, there
is technically no profit on the twenty-dollar sale and thus no capital
gains tax is owed. This can be a huge tax benefit for couples that own
significant amounts of appreciated assets.
Another distinct advantage of community property ownership is that it
works well for couples that wish to reduce or eliminate estate taxes. To
avoid such taxation, property is transferred at the death of the first
spouse to a tax sheltered Family Trust (also referred to as a Credit
Shelter Trust or Bypass Trust), rather than directly to the surviving
spouse where it would be taxable in that spouse’s estate.
Community property works well for this type of estate tax planning
because it tends to equalize the value of the estate owned by each
spouse. In community property states like Wisconsin, even if only the
husband’s name appears on the title, one half of it (with some
exceptions) is still considered legally owned by the wife; therefore,
regardless of which spouse dies first, there are assets to transfer to
the tax-sheltered family trust.
A different situation occurs in a separate property state when couples
have all of the property titled only in the name of the husband. The
husband is viewed as the owner of that property not only for purposes of
passing on the property at death, but also for the imposition of estate
taxes. This situation can cause a major tax problem if the wife dies
first. Since everything is legally titled in her husband’s name, there
will be no property from the wife’s estate to transfer to the
tax-sheltered Family Trust. The opportunity this couple had to reduce
estate taxes is lost forever.
In separate property states, the problem of one spouse individually
owing the bulk of their combined assets can be solved by gifting
selected assets from the spouse with the larger estate to the spouse
with the smaller estate. This swap of assets continues until both
spouses own assets in the amount needed to fund the Family Trust
regardless of who dies first. A downside to this strategy is that if
appreciated assets are gifted to the spouse who ends up the survivor,
there is no step-up in basis at the death of the first spouse and thus
no capital gains tax savings.
Community property ownership also provides another estate tax
planning advantage over separate property. Unless specifically provided
for, a community property spouse has no survivorship rights, other than
a homestead. The deceased spouse’s half of the property may be
transferred to a tax-sheltered Family Trust without the risk that the
transfer will be defeated by an automatic transfer to the surviving
spouse. This is contrary to a separate property system where if a couple
owns property in both names, the surviving spouse automatically owns all
such property. The unfortunate result is that no property remains to be
transferred to a tax-sheltered Family Trust. Couples intending to reduce
estate taxes in separate property states must carefully weigh the estate
tax consequences of joint tenancy ownership of property.
A final benefit of owning property in a community property state is that
individuals living there can choose for themselves which property system
they desire for part or all of their property. They can classify their
property as community, separate, or a mix of the two depending on their
individual circumstances and desires. These options may best be handled
by creating a Community Property Agreement when permitted under state
law.
A Community Property Agreement is a contract that a married couple in
a community property state sign as a couple that specifies how they want
their property to be classified. Classification may be as community
property or separate property, or a mix of the two. It is very important
that couples in community property states take advantage of the
opportunity to prepare a Community Property Agreement. Otherwise due to
the complexity of the law, it can be very difficult to know exactly how
your property is classified, and unless you know how it is classified
you cannot know with certainty how it will pass at your death.
As stated in Chapter One, the fundamental principal in estate planning
is that a person may only transfer what he or she owns. In a community
property state, a married person owns only one-half of the community
property and all of his or her individual property. Distinguishing
community property from individual property can be a rather complex
exercise.
Community property states use a complicated formula used to determine
how much of a mixed property account balance is community and how much
is individual. This formula is applied at the first spouse’s death to
determine how much of the mixed property account belongs to the
surviving spouse as community property. This calculation is critical for
estate planning purposes because the deceased spouse is legally entitled
to pass on only his or her own property to beneficiaries other than the
surviving spouse.
The complexity of these issues frequently cause Community Property
Agreements to be used to classify in advance all of the couple’s
property as individual or community in order to simplify the process at
the first spouse’s death and save costs. There are pros and cons to
classifying property as individual or community and deciding which
classification is best often entails an asset-by-asset inquiry by an
experienced estate planning attorney.
One advantage of classifying your property as community is that it will
receive the beneficial double step-up in its tax basis at the first
spouse’s death, but there are other factors to consider. In some cases,
a couple may want to forgo the capital gains tax benefits of community
property and instead classify property as individual to accomplish other
estate planning goals. Such possible goals could include the following:
• They wish to provide for children of a prior marriage;
• One spouse has a large family inheritance; or
• One spouse has exposure to creditor claims and wishes to protect the
other spouse from such claims.
In summary, a sound estate plan for married couples must always take
into account the specific laws of the state they live in. There are
important estate planning decisions that must be made whether one lives
in a separate property state, or in a community property state. Your
estate planning attorney can assist you in explaining these complicated
matters to help you maximize your estate planning opportunities and give
you confidence that you know exactly how your estate will pass at your
death.
Family owned businesses form the backbone of American enterprise, but
surveys of small business owners reveal that little or no planning for
survival of the business to the next generation has been accomplished.
The importance of family owned business is evident from statistics which
reveal that over the past decade, all net job growth in the United
States has occurred in businesses with 20 or fewer employees. Estimates
from the Internal Revenue Service suggest that 95% of U.S. corporations
are closely-held and that they account for over one-half of the gross
national product along with 50% of the total wages paid.
While nearly 70% of the family owned or closely-held business owners
express the desire to have the business remain under family ownership,
less than 1/3 of business owners have established formal business
succession plans. Children frequently come into the business with
inadequate skills or training, as nearly 85% of the children of family
business owners become involved in the family business directly from
school without obtaining other work experience. With these statistics,
it is understandable that only 35% of family businesses pass
successfully to the next generation and less than 13% of these
businesses stay in the family for a period in excess of 60 years. For
family owned businesses to accomplish successful transfer to the next
generation, appropriate planning is essential.
Depending upon the desires of the family, succession planning may
involve the sale of the business to outsiders or passing the business on
to the next generation. Given the impact of estate taxes, a business
owner must either create equity to pay the estate taxes at the time of
death or wealth transfer planning must be undertaken during life.
Succession planning with a closely held business creates its challenges
because of the inherent nature of such businesses. Typically, a family
owned business centers its goodwill around the efforts of a key
individual, who is typically the founder. Upon the death or retirement
of this individual, the business may lack successor management or the
charismatic flavor that has made the business successful.
Other reasons why the business succession fails in the majority of
instances usually center around the failure to plan and include
procrastination in planning by the business owners, failure to plan for
the payment of estate and/or income taxes, failure to arrange for funds
to provide for the retirement of the founding member while continuing to
support the business in the manner in which it can be successful,
reluctance of other family members to come into the business, leaving
the business without a successor, and family disputes concerning control
or ownership.
When lifetime planning is not done, negotiations may have to be
accomplished upon the death or withdrawal of an owner, which may lead to
family acrimony. Uncertainty as to the parents’ desires and plans
concerning decision-making authority and division of profits may cause
emotional issues that cannot be overcome. Death taxes may be incurred
which would otherwise be unnecessary, and ownership may have to be
transferred to an unsuitable outsider.
A proper business succession plan will provide for the survival and
continuity of the business. It should minimize income and estate taxes,
and it should also promote family relations through the fair treatment
of all the children and identification of the expected decision-making
process.
The first step in formulating a successful family business succession
plan is to assemble the succession planning team. In addition to the
appropriate family members, professional services of your attorney,
accountant, financial planner, and insurance professional is required.
Each team member brings different knowledge and expertise to the table.
Participation of the family is of utmost importance to identify the
planning goals of the family. These goals form the crux of the planning,
and may include such issues as the maintenance of jobs for children,
holding on to managerial control, or the transfer of control to specific
family members. The establishment of the goals provides the highway upon
which the planning team will travel.
A thorough analysis of the status of the business needs to be
undertaken, including historic financial documentation. Legal documents
must also be reviewed, including Shareholder and/or Partnership
Agreements, Employment Contracts, Articles of Incorporation, IRS
elections, Marital Property Agreements, Wills, Trust Agreements, and
Deferred Compensation Agreements. Estate and wealth transfer taxes need
to be projected and planned for. Once the succession team has identified
the plan, it needs to be shared with the family and then implemented.
As stated above, the IRS taxes all of the property that we transfer
to others whether while we are still alive or at the time of our deaths;
however, there are a few exceptions to this transfer tax. One such
exemption is that under current tax laws every American citizen can
transfer to others a certain amount of their property tax-free. The
amount of property that you can transfer tax-free is known as the
“exclusion” amount and is determined year to year by Congress. Congress
also imposes progressively larger taxes on larger estates. These taxes
can be as high as almost fifty percent of the estate. The addition of
life insurance proceeds can, and often does, push estates not only above
the exclusion amount but also from one tax bracket to the next. When
this happens, the estate becomes subject to estate taxation simply
because of the existence of the life insurance. The result is that a
large portion of the life insurance goes to pay estate taxes instead of
to the beneficiaries. Since the exclusion amount and the various tax
brackets are frequently changed by Congress, you should see a qualified
estate planning attorney to learn the current amounts and to determine
if your life insurance is rendering your estate taxable.
Although owning life insurance can add to the tax burden on your estate,
there is a solution to this problem. The solution is to place your life
insurance into a special trust known as an Irrevocable Life Insurance
Trust (ILIT).
An ILIT is similar to all trusts in that assets transferred to it are
administered by a trustee who is required to follow the trust
instructions. However, unlike revocable trusts that are usually
established for the Trustmaker’s benefit and which can be amended by the
Trustmaker at any time and for any reason, an ILIT is established for
the benefit of someone other than the Trustmaker, usually the
Trustmaker’s spouse or children. Furthermore, once created ILITs usually
cannot be amended, at least not without the permission of a court of
law. Neither of these limitations, though, is usually significant in
light of the great planning opportunities available with an ILIT.
An ILIT accomplishes two objectives. First, it removes life insurance
death proceeds from your estate and thereby reduces the value of your
estate for estate tax purposes. Second, it allows you to direct how the
proceeds of your life insurance will pass to your beneficiaries.
A brief example shows how an ILIT can prevent your life insurance from
triggering unnecessary estate taxes. As stated earlier, if at the time
of your death your property (including life insurance) exceeds the
exclusion amount, your estate will have to pay estate taxes; however, if
the life insurance is removed from your taxable estate by transferring
it to an ILIT, the taxable value of your estate will decrease by the
amount of the life insurance removed from it. The smaller your taxable
estate the smaller your estate tax burden.
The best thing about ILITs is that they are specially designed to hold
life insurance tax-free. The life insurance death proceeds will pass to
your chosen beneficiaries estate tax-free because it was owned by the
trust – not by you. It is that simple.
Does this sound too good to be true? It is not if the ILIT is properly
drafted and implemented! In order to achieve this remarkable result, the
ILIT must be drafted very carefully, the life insurance policies must be
transferred to the ILIT in a specific manner, and the life insurance
premiums must be paid in the correct fashion. Good advice from an
experienced estate planning attorney is essential to making sure each of
these detailed steps, and others, are done correctly.
One important detail in creating an ILIT is the selection of the
trustee. Unlike revocable trusts where you can be your own trustee, you
cannot be the trustee of your own ILIT. The IRS will treat the life
insurance as if it is still in your own taxable estate because you will
have too much personal control over it. Your spouse or adult child may
be the trustee, but because of the technical requirements of ILITs, a
better choice might be your accountant, other professional advisor, or a
bank or trust company. The choice of your trustee should be given
careful consideration.
Another important detail involving ILITs concerns the transfer of the
life insurance policy to the trust. You can transfer either existing
policies into your ILIT or you can have your trustee purchase a new life
insurance policy on your life that is owned by the trust.
If you transfer an existing policy into an ILIT, there are two cautions.
The transfer of an existing policy to an ILIT is treated under the tax
code as a taxable gift, with the potential to trigger gift taxes.
Whether or not the gift of an existing policy is taxable depends on the
value of the policy and the amount of the current gift tax exemption.
The other drawback of transferring an existing policy to an ILIT is that
if you die within three years of the transfer, the IRS will consider the
transfer invalid and the policy will be still included in your taxable
estate.
These limitations make it preferable to purchase a new policy if you are
still insurable. If a new policy is purchased, you will not have to be
concerned with either determining an existing policy’s value for gift
tax purposes or with the three-year transfer rule. Many clients are not
concerned about the small statistical chance of dying within three years
of the transfer. They consider the opportunity to save sometimes
hundreds of thousands of dollars of their life insurance well worth the
risk and the cost of establishing the ILIT.
When a new life insurance policy is transferred to an ILIT, the ILIT
becomes responsible for paying the premiums necessary to keep it in
force. The ILIT receives the funds needed to pay such premiums by
accepting cash gifts from you or others. When these gifts are made,
special care must be taken to ensure that no adverse federal gift taxes
are incurred. It would be pointless to avoid estate taxes only to incur
gift taxes. Careful planning is needed to simultaneously avoid both gift
and estate taxes.
Questions frequently asked are, “Is it really necessary to go through
all of the steps needed to create and transfer life insurance to an ILIT?
Wouldn’t it simply be easier to remove the insurance from my taxable
estate by gifting the policy to my spouse or another family member?”
Although gifting a life insurance policy to someone else to remove it
from your taxable estate is possible, there are a myriad of problems
with someone else owning your policy.
First, when the policy is transferred to an individual, the same gift
tax consequences must be considered that exist when transferring it to
an ILIT. The steps taken in creating an ILIT make sure these gift tax
issues are not overlooked.
Second, if a spouse or adult child owns a policy on your life, and he or
she dies first, the policy’s value may cause an estate tax problem in
his or her estate. Using an ILIT can significantly reduce or even
eliminate the estate tax specter—not merely shift the tax burden from
one person to another.
Third, when you transfer a life insurance policy to another person you
lose all legal control over it. The new owner can change the
beneficiary, take the cash value, or even cancel the insurance. Creating
an ILIT where your chosen trustee is required to follow your
instructions concerning use of trust assets can prevent this. A trustee
will be responsible for paying premiums and is more likely to keep the
policy in force than would a child or children when called upon to write
a check for the premium.
Fourth, when insurance is transferred to individuals the beneficiaries
usually receive the proceeds as an outright distribution at your death.
Your family would lose all of the distribution protections that exist
when life insurance is transferred to an ILIT. These protections include
the following:
• If your children are underage they cannot accept ownership of any
death benefits. If a minor child is named as a beneficiary of a life
insurance policy, the insurance company will not pay the proceeds to the
child. It will instead force the matter into probate court where the
court will probably order the proceeds held in trust until the child’s
eighteenth birthday. The child will then receive a cashier’s check for
the remaining balance. This would not happen with an ILIT, which would
allow you to maintain control over when and how children receive the
proceeds;
• The death of a trust beneficiary will not result in the premature
transfer of the policy to his or her spouse or minor child;
• Children may have asset protection from creditors, lawsuits, and
divorcing spouses when life insurance is placed in an ILIT;
• An ILIT guarantees that the administrator of your estate will have
liquidity needed to pay expenses and coordinate the administration of
your estate;
• ILITs permit the use of generation-skipping transfers, a method used
to pass unspent proceeds of the insurance from generation to generation
without incurring taxes, that are not available with an outright
distribution.
In summary, creating an ILIT that meets your objectives and fits into
your overall estate plan requires careful planning and the assistance of
an insurance professional and estate planning attorney. If properly
established and implemented, it is an excellent way to help create an
estate, protect an estate from unnecessary taxation, and most
importantly, provide a lasting legacy for your loved ones.
Individuals with large taxable estates often own assets that rapidly
appreciate in value. To save estate taxes, these appreciating assets
must be eliminated from the gross taxable estate. Often these assets
offer benefits like the ability to live in your home or generate
considerable income that the owner cannot or does not want to
relinquish. Also, the gift tax consequences of simply giving these
assets away may be prohibitive.
The solution to this problem is to convey such appreciating assets to an
irrevocable trust that contains special instructions. Those instructions
state that at your death the trust’s assets will belong to your
designated beneficiaries; therefore the assets will not be a part of
your taxable estate when you die. Just as important, the instructions
also state that you reserve the right for a specified number of years to
still use and benefit from the property transferred to the trust. An
advanced estate plan that includes an irrevocable trust can empower you
to personally benefit from your property while still removing it from
your taxable estate. Additionally, the asset transferred to the trust
might be entitled to a valuation discount.
One benefit of advanced planning with irrevocable trusts is that the
property transferred to the trust is often entitled to a valuation
discount for gift tax purposes. This valuation discount is given because
the beneficiaries of the trust will not receive its benefits for many
years; thus the assets transferred to the trust are significantly less
valuable to the beneficiaries than if the beneficiaries received them
immediately.
The value of the assets transferred to the trust (for gift tax purposes)
is therefore something less than their present fair market value. The
end result of such valuation discounts is that more property can be
transferred to the irrevocable trust without exceeding the amount you
can transfer free of gift taxes each year.
The calculated value of the discount when assets are transferred to an
irrevocable trust is based on several factors. These include how much
income or other benefit the Trustmaker will personally receive from the
trust, how long the Trustmaker will benefit from the trust’s property,
and the current interest rates. The more the Trustmaker personally
benefits from the trust, the less value it has to the ultimate
beneficiaries and therefore the less its value for gift tax purposes.
There are many creative ways for you to benefit from the assets
transferred to an irrevocable trust. One such way to benefit is to
reserve for yourself the right to continue living in your home even
after it is transferred to the trust. These types of irrevocable trusts
are known as Qualified Personal Residence Trusts (QPRTs).
With good planning, assets may be partially transferred to succeeding
generations without triggering the GST. Although it sought to prevent
most generation skipping transfers from occurring, Congress decided to
give individuals the right to transfer to future generations a limited
amount of property free of the GST. In addition to the estate tax
exclusion amount, every individual has an equal generation skipping tax
exemption.
It is important to realize that the generation skipping tax is imposed
in addition to the estate tax. If a grandparent attempts to transfer
more than the GST exempt amount collectively to the grandchildren, first
estate taxes and then GST taxes will be imposed on the transfer. When
the two taxes are combined, most of the estate can be consumed by taxes.
The GST exemption available to you provides a wonderful planning
opportunity when used in combination with other estate tax planning
techniques. That opportunity is called a Dynasty Trust.
A Dynasty Trust is a special trust established for those who desire
to make full use of an individual’s right to pass assets to
grandchildren or other descendants and thereby skip a generation without
the GST being imposed. Since the GST exemption applies to all
individuals, married couples can shelter two times the GST exempt amount
from GST taxes. This means that if you are married, you and your spouse
can leave twice the GST exempt amount in trust for the benefit of
succeeding generations in such a way that those assets will never again
be subject to estate taxation. The wealth in your Dynasty Trust would
then pass from generation to generation estate tax free and provide your
descendants funds for their health, support, and education. The
limitation that distributions can only be made for health, support, and
education is enough to keep the trust assets out of the beneficiary’s
estate while providing maintenance of the beneficiary’s lifestyle.
There is no reason why a Dynasty Trust cannot be incorporated into
your individually designed Revocable Living Trust. As is the case with
all revocable trusts, the planning opportunities are endless. For
example, the Dynasty Trust can provide first for the care of your
children and thereafter for your grandchildren and succeeding
generations. If you want to prevent the possibility of having the trust
assets entirely consumed by your children, you could restrict the use of
trust assets by your children to only specific purposes. After the last
of your children dies, the remaining trust assets could pass to
individual trusts established for each of your grandchildren. This
funding pattern could repeat through generations, subject only to the
limits of state law on the existence of the trust. Several states have
no artificial end to the length of time trusts can exist, and creation
of a trust in one of these states can allow a multigenerational trust to
last forever.
Apart from providing for your children and grandchildren, Dynasty Trusts
can also provide them with asset protection from abusive creditors,
lawsuits, and even from failed marriages. The assets generally cannot be
taken by outsiders or in divorce proceedings because they are owned by
the trust, not by your child or grandchild.
Additionally, as long as the Dynasty Trust does not allow the
beneficiary too much access (distributions for a beneficiary’s health,
education, maintenance and support are acceptable), the assets are never
regarded by the IRS as being “owned” by your beneficiaries and are not
taxed in their estates. This allows a terrific opportunity for the
estate tax-free growth of the assets not used to take care of the
beneficiaries.
To see just how powerful estate tax-free compounding of interest can be
over an extended period of time, consider the following example: If
trust assets grow annually at only six percent, one million dollars
grows to over eighty million dollars in the seventy five years it would
take for it to pass through three generations. During all of that time
your descendants would have comfortable access to interest earnings and
could even spend it all if needed (i.e., for a health crisis). Further,
if they bought and retained assets in the name of the trust, they would
always have the dual benefits of asset protection and estate tax-free
growth.
Conversely, assume that your family does not create a Dynasty Trust and
the one million dollars similarly grows at six percent over seventy-five
years. If each generation is taxed at fifty-five percent, after
seventy-five years the money will have grown to be only slightly more
than seven million dollars. Using conservative numbers, over a
seventy-five year period the difference between using a Dynasty Trust
and not using a Dynasty Trust is about seventy-three million dollars!
A revocable trust is just one of the estate planning tools available
to take advantage of Dynasty Trust planning. Irrevocable Life Insurance
Trusts provide another vehicle by which parents can use Dynasty Trust
planning to benefit their children, grandchildren, or both. If done
correctly, the generation skipping tax exemption can be applied to the
money gifted to the ILIT and used to pay the insurance premiums. In this
scenario, the amount of the GST exemption used up is the amount of the
gifts used to pay the life insurance premium and not the insurances
death benefit. For example, if a grandparent gifted one hundred thousand
dollars to an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust established
to benefit the grandchildren, ILIT Trustee could use it to purchase a
life insurance policy worth several times the gift. The GST exemption
would then be used to offset the GST taxes due, but the amount of the
GST taxes is based only on the gifted amount of the premiums rather than
the higher death benefit! This enables a large amount of life insurance
to be purchased tax-free and used tax-free by mulitple generations. This
is just one example among a number of other opportunities that are
available for you to take advantage of with Dynasty Trust planning.
Whether your estate is large or small, a Dynasty Trust can provide
significant estate planning benefits. Do you want your grandchildren’s
inheritance, however modest or great, to be protected from abusive
creditors, lawsuits, or future divorces? Do you want mulitple
generations of your descendants to receive their inheritance federal
estate tax-free? If you answer, “yes” to either of these questions, then
you should seriously consider implementing a Dynasty Trust to protect
your family.
The benefits of creating a Charitable Remainder Trust can include the
following:
• The Trustmakers win by: (a) gaining a lifetime income, while avoiding
capital gains tax upon the sale of appreciated assets; (b) obtaining an
immediate income tax deduction that can be carried forward for up to
five years; (c) achieving a possible estate tax savings; and
(d) creating a wonderful opportunity to accomplish their charitable
dreams;
• The Trustmaker’s chosen charities win by being the recipient of the
Trustmaker’s philanthropy; and
• Society wins because charities will promote social good and wisely use
“social capital.”
If any of these benefits sound intriguing, then the Charitable Remainder
Trust might be just the answer to your estate planning needs.
A Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT) is a special type of irrevocable
trust in which the assets donated to it are shared between the
Trustmakers and charitable beneficiaries. Typically, a CRT pays income
to the Trustmakers for a number of years (or even the Trustmakers’
entire lives), after which any remaining principal is paid to qualified
charities.
Charitable Remainder Trusts offer you the ability to benefit from the
sale of property that you might otherwise be hesitant to sell because of
the capital gains taxes that would be due. CRTs are the result of
special legislation that is intended to promote charitable giving by
making it possible for you to gift highly appreciated assets (i.e.,
publicly traded stock, real estate, etc.) to a CRT capital gains
tax-free. In turn, the trust provides an agreed upon annual income back
to you, the Trustmaker. Additional benefits to you include an income tax
charitable deduction as well as potential estate tax savings, because
the assets are removed from your taxable estate once they are
transferred to the CRT.
A CRT is usually superior to an outright sale of assets. The capital
gains tax-free sale of an asset to the CRT means that its entire value
is working for you—not just the amount left over after the taxes are
paid. Once the additional charitable income tax deduction and estate tax
savings are factored in, the tax savings can be spectacular.
A CRT should be considered an important planning option anytime the
owner of an appreciated asset would like to sell it tax-free in order to
obtain more income. The income provided by a CRT can be paid monthly,
quarterly, or annually and, among other possibilities, used to increase
your standard of living, provide for your retirement, assist elderly
parents, fund a trust for a special needs child, or help your
grandchildren go to college.
Many of our clients have built up sizable estates through a lifetime
of saving their hard earned money and living frugally. The newly
available income provided from their CRT gives these couples the
opportunity to remodel their home, buy that new car, go out more
frequently, or take that long delayed vacation.
If you are not able to make contributions to individual retirement
accounts or other retirement plans, you can still use the tax-exempt
status of a CRT to build for yourself the equivalent of a retirement
plan.
For example, let’s say that you are fifty-five years old and own stock
for which you paid very little. It is now worth a substantial sum, but
yields almost no income. If you sell the stock, you will owe capital
gains taxes on its entire increase in value. This will leave less for
you to reinvest for your retirement when you will need additional
income. After careful thought and study, you decide to give the stock to
a CRT. The trust can sell the stock without paying taxes on the gain.
Since the entire value of the stock will be available to invest, you
will receive more yearly income for the rest of your life than if you
had sold the stock and reinvested the balance. As an additional benefit,
you will receive a charitable income tax deduction that can be used to
offset some of your other income.
As our population ages, many working families are finding it
necessary to save not only for their own retirement but also for the
possibility that they will have to provide some financial assistance to
their parents. Such assistance is not tax deductible and may result in
gift tax consequences if it exceeds certain amounts. A CRT offers a
simple solution to this dilemma. You can transfer assets to a CRT that
will provide a fixed income for life to an older relative instead of
income for yourself. You will be entitled to a substantial charitable
deduction for your gift to the trust and also be assured of proper
management of the assets in the event you become unable to manage them
yourself. At your parent’s death, the trust ends and the assets will be
distributed to your favorite charity—perhaps even in your parent’s name.
We are all faced with the rising cost of education. Every year those
costs are increasing faster than inflation making it more difficult for
parents to afford a quality education for their children. One solution
to these escalating educational costs is for parents or grandparents to
establish a CRT in which the income is used for a child’s or
grandchild’s education.
If you give money directly to your children or grandchildren for their
college expenses, the gift will not be tax deductible and it may even be
subject to gift taxes. If you create a CRT, you will receive an
immediate income tax deduction for the assets transferred to it because
when the trust ends, any remaining assets will be distributed for
charitable purposes.
For example, assume you have a grandchild who will be starting college
in a few years. Also assume that you own stock purchased many years ago
that has increased substantially in value, but pays only small
dividends.
You could sell the stock, pay the capital gains taxes, and then gift the
remaining proceeds to your grandchild to pay for college. The gift,
however, will not be tax deductible, it might be subject to gift
taxation, and you will lose control over how your grandchild uses the
money.
A wiser option might be to transfer the asset to a charitable trust
designed to produce income for your grandchild’s education. In this
happier scenario, you will be entitled to a tax deduction for the
transfer because the trust will last only a few years (up to the year of
the budding scholar’s anticipated college graduation) after which the
remainder will be distributed for charitable purposes.
The CRT will then sell and invest the asset gift tax-free. Each year,
according to your instructions, the CRT will pay a fixed amount only for
your grandchild’s education. After your grandchild graduates, your CRT
will make your charitable dreams a reality.
Although a CRT is an excellent planning tool that can increase one’s
income, avoid unnecessary taxation, and achieve one’s charitable
planning dreams, one question that is frequently raised concerning them,
usually by the Trustmaker’s children, is “What about our inheritance if
everything in the CRT gets distributed as income or is left to a
charity?”
It is not uncommon for the Trustmaker’s children to view their parent’s
desire to create a CRT skeptically for the fear of being disinherited or
they may be suspicious that their parent is being unduly pressured by a
charity into creating it. Fortunately, these types of objections are
easily overcome once the children learn that by establishing the CRT
their parents can actually increase the children’s inheritance and
enable everyone (parents, charity, and children) to benefit.
The key to achieving this incredible win win win scenario lies in the
fact that once the parents have established the CRT, they will be
receiving a new stream of income. The parents can deal with the
children’s concerns about being disinherited by simply taking a fraction
of that income and using it to purchase a new life insurance policy in
an amount at least equal to the value of the asset transferred to the
CRT.
Often the tax savings and additional income produced by the CRT enable
the parents to purchase life insurance (also known as wealth replacement
insurance) with a death benefit even greater than the value of the asset
being transferred to the CRT. Even better, if the new life insurance
policy is owned by an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust created by the
parents, the insurance proceeds will be outside the parent’s estate and
thus transferred to the children estate tax free. Most children are also
pleased to learn that their inheritance will come in the form of a cash
distribution from the ILIT instead of having to deal with selling a
major asset after their parents die.
Both Charitable Remainder Trusts and Charitable Lead Trusts (CLT)
result in gifts being made to a charity. They differ with respect to the
timing of the gift. With a CRT, the Trustmakers receive the trust’s
income and the charity receives the assets remaining at the time the
trust terminates, which is usually at the death of the Trustmaker or
beneficiary. With a CLT the charity receives the trust’s income and the
Trustmaker (or the Trustmaker’s selected beneficiary) receives the
assets remaining at the time the trust terminates. Recipients of income
and assets are reversed with a CLT compared to a CRT.
Assume that you desire to immediately help one of your favorite
charities with the income produced by one of your assets (a rental
apartment, for example) but you still want to ultimately keep the
apartment itself in the family. At the same time you would also like to
reduce your estate tax liability. A CRT will clearly not work in this
situation. But a CLT might offer the ideal solution to accomplish these
goals.
You could place your apartment into a CLT. A named charity will receive
the rental income for the lifetime of the trust, after which time your
children become the apartment’s owners. Although your children will not
receive the apartment building for a number of years, the value of your
gift made to them, (for gift and estate tax purposes) must be calculated
at the time the apartment is transferred to the CLT.
The value of an apartment received many years from now is not the same
as the value of an apartment received today. No one would pay full price
today for something they will receive only in the future. Accordingly,
your children are entitled to discount the apartment’s current fair
market value in proportion to how long they have to wait to receive it.
It is this discounted value of the apartment, instead of its present
fair market value, that is used to determine gift and estate taxes on
your estate. The result can be a large tax savings to your children. In
the meantime, rather than depreciating in value, the apartment building
has actually continued to grow in value.
Your charity immediately benefits from the establishment of a CLT and
your children will receive an asset that has appreciated in actual value
yet has a substantially discounted value for estate tax purposes. Good
things are possible for those who take the time to properly plan their
estates! Your estate planning attorney will be able to help you
determine whether a CRT or a CLT is an appropriate estate planning
option for you.
A Limited Partnership is a business entity established under state
law. Ownership of the partnership is broken into two classes of
partners—general and limited. The distinction between a general partner
and a limited partner is important because it determines whether you
will have a say in the partnership’s management or whether you receive
liability protection from the partnership’s activities. Limited
Partnerships are frequently used by family members or business
associates to facilitate transfers of assets to others, often at a
discounted value that permits significant tax savings.
An important aspect of limited partnerships is that only general
partners, not limited partners, have any say in the management of the
partnership. This means that the general partners (usually the parents
or older generation) entirely control it and are the only ones
personally liable for the partnership’s business dealings.
Since the limited partners have no say in the partnership’s control or
management, normally they are not personally liable for partnership
liabilities except to the extent of their investment in the partnership.
A Limited Partnership offers important asset protection planning
opportunities for those seeking to protect their personal assets.
A Limited Partnership provides significant opportunities to reduce
your estate taxes. In fact, many partnerships are created principally
because the partners receive significant accounting discounts in the
value of property transferred to the partnership.
The greater the discounted value of the property transferred to the
partnership, the lower its taxable value for gift and estate tax
purposes.
The ability to discount an asset’s value when transferred to a Limited
Partnership is a result of how assets are valued on the free market. The
Internal Revenue Service and Tax Courts recognize that the fair market
value of an asset over which you possess total control is greater than
the fair market value of an asset over which you possess little control.
No one would pay the same price for a business controlled by others
(even family members), as they would pay for a business they could run
as they pleased.
A Limited Partnership may be an attractive estate planning tool because,
due to the limited partner’s lack of control over the management of
partnership assets, a legitimate discount in the asset’s free market
value will be available for their interest in the partnership.
Generally speaking, the less control a limited partner has in the
partnership, the greater the valuation discount given. In order to
obtain the maximum discount, many partnership agreements intentionally
contain many restrictions on the rights of limited partners to be
involved in partnership decisions, to withdraw from the partnership, and
even on their right to sell their partnership interests. Such
partnership restrictions must not be more severe than those permitted by
state law or they will be disregarded for the calculation of any
discount.
Limited Partnerships can also be coupled with gifting strategies to help
you reduce estate taxes. To accomplish this, you would first create a
Limited Partnership and transfer assets (such as a family business) to
it. Then over a period of years you would slowly transfer partnership
interests to your children who are made limited partners. The value of
the partnership interests transferred is intentionally kept below the
annual gift tax exemption amount to avoid any gift tax liability. When
done correctly, this strategy can transfer a significant part of the
estate to the children gift and estate tax-free while keeping the
parents in total control.
A Limited Partnership can also be used by families to provide income tax
savings to family members. Subject to certain restrictions, the members
of a Limited Partnership can allocate income and deductions among the
general and limited partners in any agreed upon way. This ability to
allocate income to individual partners permits a family to distribute
partnership income to lower tax bracket members.
Before organizing a Limited Partnership, you should seek the advice
of your estate planning attorney concerning a multitude of issues. Those
issues include selection of the general partner and deciding who will be
responsible for the partnership’s day-to-day management.
Also, since a general partner has unlimited liability for partnership
liabilities and losses, the desires of the partners concerning liability
for the partnership’s business transactions and their desires regarding
the protection of their personal assets from partnership liabilities
must be examined. Additionally, the level of trust that the partners
have in each other must be considered because the actions of one general
partner can legally bind the others.
Taxation of business entity issues must also be examined. Limited
partnerships are a flow-through entity. This means that the
partnership’s income and deductions are reported on each partner’s
individual tax return. The partnership itself pays no federal income
tax, a significant benefit over corporations, which normally are taxed
at the corporate level.
Other tax ramifications should also be considered. Organizing
exclusively as a Limited Partnership may foreclose some tax planning
opportunities, particularly in the area of employee benefits. A careful
planner will make you aware that a corporation can serve as a general
partner.
This option may be appropriate because a corporation can provide
employee benefits and other planning opportunities not available to
partnerships. If a corporation is chosen to act as the general partner,
it is possible to have the corporate general partner elect “S
Corporation” tax status. This would also provide an opportunity for
flow-through taxation at the individual level.
A Limited Partnership is an excellent tool that empowers you to
maintain control over assets while at the same time offering you the
flexibility needed to devise and implement a sound estate planning
strategy that can deal simultaneously with a multitude of business and
family issues. These issues require an analysis of your assets, your
business succession desires, how control over the partnership is to be
allocated between general and limited partners, the asset protection
consequences, and the estate, gift, and income tax ramifications.
Of course, by itself a Limited Partnership is not a complete estate
plan. It works best in conjunction with your Revocable Living Trust and
other planning documents to make sure that your estate planning desires
are completely fulfilled. It is important to discuss these serious
issues in depth with your estate planning attorney before deciding
whether a Limited Partnership is an appropriate tool in your estate
plan. Although we live in a time when many less than scrupulous
individuals are trying to sell fill-in-the-blank partnership forms, only
a qualified estate planning attorney will be able to help you sort out
your options and tailor a plan that will best protect your family.
Put simply, asset protection planning is the process of removing your
property from your individual ownership and placing it beyond the reach
of potential claimants and creditors. The process involves changing
legal ownership of your property from your individual name to a
protective entity, such as a limited partnership or trust.
If that sounds like a terrible idea, hold on. A properly designed
limited partnership or trust can give you all the benefits of ownership,
such as control over an asset’s disposition and the right to its income.
The difference is that since you no longer legally own the asset, it
cannot be seized to satisfy a judgment against you. It is the savvy
planner who realizes that in today’s world legal control over an asset
is often more beneficial than directly owning it.
Back to Top
As stated in the preceding chapter, Limited Partnerships offer
significant asset protection opportunities. Limited partnerships provide
such asset protection because of the way the laws that govern
partnerships treat partners and partnership assets. As you will recall,
limited partnerships have two kinds of partners, each with dramatically
different roles and responsibilities. General partners manage the
partnership, and thus have full responsibility and control.
Limited partners, on the other hand, have little, if any, input into the
running of the partnership; therefore, they are not held responsible for
its management or any liability it might create. No one would want to
become a limited partner without this protection. The law is designed to
encourage the creation of partnerships and the economic benefits they
produce for society.
The second important feature of limited partnerships is that assets
titled in the name of the partnership are deemed the property of the
partnership itself, not that of the individual partners. The legal
importance of this arrangement is that partnership assets are shielded
from creditor claims against the individual partners. In other words, a
creditor cannot force the sale of assets owned by the partnership to
satisfy a judgment against one of its members. Instead, such creditors
are entitled to attach only the member’s individually owned assets and
to receive any distributions made by the partnership to that member.
To achieve asset protection with a Limited Partnership, you would
transfer individual assets (real estate, business interests,
investments, artwork, etc.) out of your personal name and into the name
of the Limited Partnership. A common arrangement would be for you to
become a one percent general partner, giving you the right to fully
control and manage property just as before. You would also become a
ninety-nine percent limited partner, entitling you to receive income
from the partnership, but shielding your limited partnership assets from
creditor claims. For the greatest asset protection, most individuals who
use Limited Partnerships transfer part of their limited partnership
shares to others, usually family members. This shows that the
partnership has legitimate business purposes other than just defeating
creditor claims and makes them more likely to survive a court challenge.
Because Limited Partnerships can provide significant tax advantages, as
well as asset protection, it is often an ideal strategy to use when an
individual wants to pass wealth, especially a business, to other family
members.
Sometimes a Limited Partnership alone isn’t enough protection against
possible lawsuits or creditor actions. That’s when an Offshore Trust
becomes an important tool in the asset protection toolkit.
An Offshore Trust is simply a trust created outside of the legal
jurisdiction of the United States. These Offshore Trusts are effective
in protecting assets simply because the laws of the nations in which
they are drafted provide better creditor protection than the protections
provided in the United States of America.
In the United States, generally no asset protection exists for assets
that you place in a trust created to benefit yourself and for which you
are the trustee. In such cases, the trust’s assets can be seized by your
creditors just as if they were owned in your own name.
However, a handful of other nations—such as the Isle of Man, the Cook
Islands, and Belize, to name a few—offer Trustmakers greater asset
protection. These nations allow you to be the Trustmaker, Trustee, and
the Trust Beneficiary and still protect the trust’s assets from
creditors.
Furthermore, these countries will not honor a United States Court’s
judgment or lien against trust assets in their jurisdiction. Before a
creditor can seize trust assets, these nations require that a trial be
held on their soil. The creditor must pay the often exorbitant fees
associated with litigating a case in a foreign country. The cost of
bringing witnesses and other legal evidence to a foreign court can prove
prohibitive, as can the legal fees of a local attorney. Legal fees alone
can prove a costly and insurmountable burden to bringing a lawsuit, as
the trust-favorable nations do not allow for contingency fee lawsuits.
Instead, they require that the plaintiff’s attorney be paid without
regard to the outcome of the action.
If this were not enough in the way of asset protection, these nations
also demand that the plaintiff meet the burden of proof required in
United States criminal courts. A creditor plaintiff must prove its case
“beyond a reasonable doubt,” not the much more lax “preponderance of
evidence” standard used in the United States.
Finally, the countries most favorable to Offshore Trusts greatly limit
the amount of time allowed to a plaintiff to bring legal action. In the
United States, plaintiffs often have many years to file a lawsuit but in
these offshore nations, plaintiffs have only a year or two to bring
suit, depending on the circumstances. So for those desiring greater
asset protection, Offshore Trusts can provide immeasurable peace of
mind.
To obtain the legal protections offered by Offshore Trusts, typically
you would have your attorney create both a limited partnership and a
trust in the desired offshore nation. You would then transfer your
ninety-nine percent limited partnership shares to the Offshore Trust and
retain the one-percent general partner share. Doing this would afford
you the greatest possible degree of protection for your wealth, while
preserving complete control over the assets themselves.
Fortunately, Offshore Trust laws do not require that the assets
literally be removed from U.S. soil nor do they require that the
Trustmaker relocate to a foreign country. As long as the ownership of
the assets and the jurisdiction governing the trust reside in a
trust-favorable nation, the Trustmaker receives full asset protection.
The reality is that asset protection planning is more costly to
implement than other estate plans. In addition, you’ll spend more each
year to maintain it but keep in mind the savings it can also generate.
You may be able to reduce considerably the malpractice or business
liability insurance premiums you now pay once most of your assets are
protected offshore. Furthermore, you can save the enormous cost of
defending yourself in a lawsuit, or worse, losing it all in court. With
proper asset protection in place, you may never have to experience
either. The peace of mind alone afforded by this planning option is
often well worth the modest investment.
If an Offshore Trust makes sense to you, the time to implement it is now
before it is too late and a legal crisis is already upon you. If you
wait until action against you is “pending, threatened, or expected,” the
measures you take to remove wealth from your estate will be deemed a
fraudulent conveyance and invalidated by a court of law.
Moreover, don’t think that an Offshore Trust will lessen your tax
liability. If you remove assets offshore, you are required to notify the
IRS.
One final note is also in order. In an attempt to capture some of the
Offshore Trust business, a few states recently enacted laws which
promise to provide trusts created under their jurisdiction with some of
the same protections offered by trusts created in foreign jurisdictions.
While it’s possible that these trusts may work for those who live, work,
and own all their assets in one of these states, those in other states
may be exposed to creditor action just as before because each state’s
courts are required to give “full faith and credit” to the judgments of
other states’ courts. A judgment against you in one state would be
honored by the other states, even if the trust you’ve created seemed to
promise you complete protection.
If you think that asset protection may be for you, sit down immediately
with your trusted estate planning attorney. It is your attorney who can
evaluate your individual situation and determine the most effective
strategy to help you meet your asset protection goals.
Despite its promises to “simplify” the tax code, Congress’ never ending
changes to our nation’s estate and gift tax code have made it too
complicated for most people to understand. Nonetheless, a review of its
basic details is essential to understanding how to protect your estate.
Federal estate and gift taxes are what is known as transfer taxes.
Simply put, they are taxes on your right to give money or property to
others. The gift tax is a tax on your right to give money away while you
are alive. The estate tax is a tax on your right to leave your property
to others at your death.
... ?
[_]
Copyright © 2007 [ESTATE & BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P.C. All
rights reserved.
Revised:
04/08/10.
|